vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Arcellx, Inc. (ACLX) and Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. (IDR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.6M vs $8.1M, roughly 1.8× Arcellx, Inc.). Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 64.3% vs -766.0%, a 830.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (92.0% vs -79.3%). Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.2M vs $-63.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (57.2% CAGR vs -24.6%).
Arcellx, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company that develops innovative chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapies for treating hard-to-treat cancers including hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. Its core pipeline targets unmet oncology medical needs, serving global patient populations and partnering with life sciences stakeholders.
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.IDREarnings & Financial Report
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. is a U.S.-based natural resource company focused on the exploration, development, and production of critical and strategic minerals. Primarily operating in Idaho, it targets rare earth elements, gold, silver, and other high-demand minerals, supplying products to the clean energy, defense, and industrial manufacturing sectors across North America.
ACLX vs IDR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.1M | $14.6M |
| Net Profit | $-62.3M | $9.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 68.5% |
| Operating Margin | -847.6% | 62.4% |
| Net Margin | -766.0% | 64.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -79.3% | 92.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -765.1% | 220.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.13 | $0.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.1M | $7.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.3M | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.0M | $6.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.4M | $6.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.3M | $5.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-62.3M | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-47.1M | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.9M | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-27.2M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.2M | $2.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 68.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 63.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 57.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 50.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 53.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 48.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 50.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 62.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 26.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -847.6% | 19.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -348.2% | 36.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -129.1% | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -127.8% | 34.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -40.3% | 36.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 64.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 29.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -766.0% | 22.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -308.4% | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -99.4% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -99.3% | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -18.3% | 36.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.13 | $0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.87 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.48 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.51 | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $543.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $416.9M | $108.2M |
| Total Assets | $648.1M | $116.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.02× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $543.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $587.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $574.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $516.7M | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $573.9M | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $108.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $74.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $49.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.9M | $39.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $454.8M | $37.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $483.0M | $33.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $487.2M | $25.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $496.6M | $21.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $116.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $83.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $57.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $648.1M | $48.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $711.3M | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $764.9M | $40.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $734.3M | $32.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $779.7M | $28.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.15× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-63.1M | $10.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-63.9M | $8.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -786.4% | 56.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 9.6% | 17.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.15× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-122.5M | $12.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $10.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-63.1M | $2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-46.0M | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.7M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-36.2M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-31.9M | $2.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $709.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-63.9M | $1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-47.5M | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.4M | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-39.5M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-38.3M | $2.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 56.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 26.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -786.4% | 13.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -311.3% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 109.2% | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -144.1% | 38.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -97.7% | 38.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 19.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.8% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.8% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.4% | 5.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.50× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.08× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.19× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
