vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) and Alto Ingredients, Inc. (ALTO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Alto Ingredients, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($232.0M vs $231.3M, roughly 1.0× ACM Research, Inc.). Alto Ingredients, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 9.4% vs 7.5%, a 1.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ACM Research, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (34.2% vs -1.9%). Over the past eight quarters, ACM Research, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (6.9% CAGR vs -1.8%).
ACM Research, Inc. is a leading global supplier of advanced processing equipment for the semiconductor manufacturing industry. It designs, develops and commercializes high-performance wet processing systems including wafer cleaning, electroplating and etching tools, which support production of advanced logic, memory and power semiconductor chips, serving chip manufacturers across Asia, North America and Europe.
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. is an American multinational cybersecurity company with headquarters in Santa Clara, California. The core product is a platform that includes advanced firewalls and cloud-based offerings that extend those firewalls to cover other aspects of security. The company serves over 70,000 organizations in over 150 countries, including 85 of the Fortune 100. It is home to the Unit 42 threat research team and hosts the Ignite cybersecurity conference. It is a partner organizati...
ACMR vs ALTO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $231.3M | $232.0M |
| Net Profit | $17.3M | $21.8M |
| Gross Margin | 46.4% | 6.5% |
| Operating Margin | 15.6% | 3.2% |
| Net Margin | 7.5% | 9.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 34.2% | -1.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -44.7% | 152.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.24 | $0.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $231.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $244.4M | $232.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $269.2M | $241.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.4M | $218.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $172.3M | $226.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $223.5M | $236.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $204.0M | $251.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $202.5M | $236.5M |
| Q1 26 | $17.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.0M | $21.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.9M | $14.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.8M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.4M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.1M | $-41.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.9M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.2M | $-3.1M |
| Q1 26 | 46.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 40.9% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.0% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.5% | -0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.9% | -0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.6% | -0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 51.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 47.8% | 3.2% |
| Q1 26 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.4% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.7% | -3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.0% | -4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.7% | -16.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.7% | -0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.6% | -0.6% |
| Q1 26 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.3% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.3% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.8% | -5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.8% | -5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.9% | -17.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | -1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.0% | -1.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.24 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | $0.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.52 | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.44 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.47 | $-0.56 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.45 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.35 | $-0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $872.3M | $23.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $314.8M | $84.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.1B | $245.2M |
| Total Assets | $3.1B | $388.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.15× | 0.34× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $872.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $792.9M | $23.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $32.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $463.2M | $29.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $475.6M | $26.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $426.8M | $35.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $353.8M | $33.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $343.6M | $27.1M |
| Q1 26 | $314.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $214.0M | $84.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $242.0M | $106.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $225.1M | $124.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $202.5M | $117.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $150.0M | $99.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $150.0M | $90.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.5M | $98.6M |
| Q1 26 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $245.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $222.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $986.5M | $207.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $949.1M | $213.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $904.6M | $225.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $888.2M | $263.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $833.2M | $265.8M |
| Q1 26 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $388.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $388.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $393.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $402.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $401.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $417.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $432.5M |
| Q1 26 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.15× | 0.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.17× | 0.48× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.23× | 0.60× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.21× | 0.55× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.17× | 0.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.17× | 0.34× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.11× | 0.37× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $9.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $7.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 3.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.44× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $8.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $33.9M | $9.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.6M | $22.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-44.9M | $-848.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $-18.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $88.6M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.9M | $18.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $61.6M | $-13.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $20.1M | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.6M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-59.6M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.4M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.2M | $-11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-20.6M | $18.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.5M | $-18.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.8% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -27.7% | -0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.6% | -8.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.5% | -4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.1% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.0% | -7.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.21× | 0.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.13× | 1.60× | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.51× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.85× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.54× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ACMR
Segment breakdown not available.
ALTO
| Pekin Campus Production | $105.1M | 45% |
| Total Marketing And Distribution Sales | $57.9M | 25% |
| Marketing And Distributions | $55.6M | 24% |
| Other | $11.2M | 5% |
| Kodiak Carbonic LLC | $2.1M | 1% |
