vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ACACIA RESEARCH CORP (ACTG) and Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. (EOSE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($58.0M vs $50.1M, roughly 1.2× ACACIA RESEARCH CORP). ACACIA RESEARCH CORP runs the higher net margin — 6.8% vs -207.7%, a 214.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (699.6% vs 2.6%).
Acacia Research Corporation is a publicly traded American company based in New York City. It acquires and operates businesses in industries including the technology, energy, and industrial/manufacturing sectors. Acacia has a strategic relationship with Starboard Value, LP, the company's controlling shareholder. The company has been characterized as a patent troll.
Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. is an energy storage solutions provider that designs, produces and deploys safe long-duration zinc-based battery systems. It serves utility, commercial, industrial and microgrid customers across North America, Europe and Asia, supporting grid stability and renewable energy integration.
ACTG vs EOSE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $50.1M | $58.0M |
| Net Profit | $3.4M | $-120.5M |
| Gross Margin | 12.8% | -93.8% |
| Operating Margin | -26.1% | -140.1% |
| Net Margin | 6.8% | -207.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.6% | 699.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 125.5% | 55.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $-0.53 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $50.1M | $58.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $59.4M | $30.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.2M | $15.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $124.4M | $10.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $48.8M | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.4M | $-120.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.7M | $-641.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.3M | $-222.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.3M | $15.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.4M | $-268.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-14.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-186.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | 12.8% | -93.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.2% | -111.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.8% | -203.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.4% | -234.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.6% | -324.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 49.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -26.1% | -140.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.8% | -200.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -24.2% | -419.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.8% | -506.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -32.4% | -712.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -44.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.8% | -207.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.6% | -2102.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.4% | -1463.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.5% | 144.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.5% | -3696.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -60.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -32.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $-0.53 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.03 | $-4.91 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | $-1.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.25 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.14 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.14 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.08 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $306.7M | $568.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $91.9M | $813.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $543.5M | $-2.2B |
| Total Assets | $771.0M | $885.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.17× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $306.7M | $568.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $301.8M | $58.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $316.7M | $120.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $272.0M | $82.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $273.9M | $74.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $410.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $441.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $498.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $91.9M | $813.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $448.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $445.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $325.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $316.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $543.5M | $-2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $537.6M | $-2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $538.6M | $-1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $540.2M | $-942.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $514.8M | $-1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $540.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $568.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $771.0M | $885.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $768.9M | $328.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $775.5M | $361.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $801.6M | $263.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $756.4M | $260.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $707.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $753.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $631.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $75.2M | $-50.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-75.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -129.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 43.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 22.01× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-265.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $75.2M | $-50.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5M | $-65.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.1M | $-66.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | $-28.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.1M | $-42.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-593.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-75.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-82.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-73.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $335.0K | $-33.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-98.5M | $-55.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-126.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -129.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -271.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -480.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | -323.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -201.8% | -769.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -490.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 224.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 55.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 46.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 47.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 304.4% | 180.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 553.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 22.01× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.10× | -1.91× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ACTG
| Energy Operations | $16.0M | 32% |
| Transportation Safety | $10.4M | 21% |
| Office Storage And Display Solutions | $8.4M | 17% |
| Printers Consumables And Parts | $6.5M | 13% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $5.1M | 10% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $3.3M | 7% |
EOSE
Segment breakdown not available.
