vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ACACIA RESEARCH CORP (ACTG) and KURA SUSHI USA, INC. (KRUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KURA SUSHI USA, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($73.5M vs $50.1M, roughly 1.5× ACACIA RESEARCH CORP). ACACIA RESEARCH CORP runs the higher net margin — 6.8% vs -4.2%, a 11.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KURA SUSHI USA, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs 2.6%). Over the past eight quarters, ACACIA RESEARCH CORP's revenue compounded faster (43.6% CAGR vs 13.2%).
Acacia Research Corporation is a publicly traded American company based in New York City. It acquires and operates businesses in industries including the technology, energy, and industrial/manufacturing sectors. Acacia has a strategic relationship with Starboard Value, LP, the company's controlling shareholder. The company has been characterized as a patent troll.
Kura Sushi, Inc. is a Japanese conveyor belt sushi restaurant chain. It is the second largest sushi restaurant chain in Japan, behind Sushiro and ahead of Hama Sushi. Its headquarters are in Sakai, Osaka Prefecture. It has 543 locations in Japan, 56 in Taiwan, and 69 in the United States.
ACTG vs KRUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $50.1M | $73.5M |
| Net Profit | $3.4M | $-3.1M |
| Gross Margin | 12.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -26.1% | -5.0% |
| Net Margin | 6.8% | -4.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.6% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 125.5% | -218.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $-0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $50.1M | $73.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $59.4M | $79.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.2M | $74.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $124.4M | $64.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $48.8M | $64.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.3M | $66.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8M | $63.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.3M | $57.3M |
| Q4 25 | $3.4M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.7M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.3M | $565.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.3M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.4M | $-961.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-14.0M | $-5.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.4M | $-558.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-186.0K | $-998.0K |
| Q4 25 | 12.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 49.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -26.1% | -5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.8% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -24.2% | -0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.8% | -7.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -32.4% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -44.1% | -8.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.4% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.6% | -2.9% |
| Q4 25 | 6.8% | -4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.6% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.5% | -5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.5% | -1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -60.0% | -7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -32.7% | -0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.8% | -1.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.03 | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | $0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.25 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.14 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.14 | $-0.47 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.08 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | $-0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $306.7M | $50.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $91.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $543.5M | $229.2M |
| Total Assets | $771.0M | $443.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.17× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $306.7M | $50.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $301.8M | $62.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $316.7M | $60.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $272.0M | $85.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $273.9M | $107.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $410.9M | $51.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $441.9M | $60.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $498.4M | $62.8M |
| Q4 25 | $91.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $543.5M | $229.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $537.6M | $231.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $538.6M | $227.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $540.2M | $225.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $514.8M | $227.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $540.2M | $162.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.7M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $568.3M | $165.3M |
| Q4 25 | $771.0M | $443.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $768.9M | $430.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $775.5M | $419.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $801.6M | $410.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $756.4M | $403.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $707.6M | $328.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $753.6M | $324.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $631.7M | $315.5M |
| Q4 25 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $75.2M | $529.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-13.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -18.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 18.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 22.01× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-27.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $75.2M | $529.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5M | $9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.1M | $6.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.1M | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-593.0K | $669.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.1M | $8.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.8M | $3.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-79.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $335.0K | $-7.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-98.5M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.8M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-126.7M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.6M | $-9.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | -18.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | -11.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -201.8% | -11.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.1% | -14.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -490.5% | -3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 224.4% | -16.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 17.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 304.4% | 17.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 553.0% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.1% | 23.5% |
| Q4 25 | 22.01× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.12× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.10× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ACTG
| Energy Operations | $16.0M | 32% |
| Transportation Safety | $10.4M | 21% |
| Office Storage And Display Solutions | $8.4M | 17% |
| Printers Consumables And Parts | $6.5M | 13% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $5.1M | 10% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $3.3M | 7% |
KRUS
Segment breakdown not available.
