vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of ACACIA RESEARCH CORP (ACTG) and TWIN DISC INC (TWIN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

TWIN DISC INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($90.2M vs $50.1M, roughly 1.8× ACACIA RESEARCH CORP). TWIN DISC INC runs the higher net margin — 24.8% vs 6.8%, a 18.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ACACIA RESEARCH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.6% vs 0.3%). Over the past eight quarters, ACACIA RESEARCH CORP's revenue compounded faster (43.6% CAGR vs 10.3%).

Acacia Research Corporation is a publicly traded American company based in New York City. It acquires and operates businesses in industries including the technology, energy, and industrial/manufacturing sectors. Acacia has a strategic relationship with Starboard Value, LP, the company's controlling shareholder. The company has been characterized as a patent troll.

Twin Disc, Inc. designs, manufactures, and distributes power transmission equipment for a wide range of applications, including marine, off-road vehicle, and industrial. The company was founded in 1918 to manufacture clutches for farm tractors. It is now a worldwide company with subsidiaries or sales offices in Asia, Europe, North America, Oceania, and South America.

ACTG vs TWIN — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TWIN
TWIN
1.8× larger
TWIN
$90.2M
$50.1M
ACTG
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
ACTG
ACTG
+2.3% gap
ACTG
2.6%
0.3%
TWIN
Higher net margin
TWIN
TWIN
18.0% more per $
TWIN
24.8%
6.8%
ACTG
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
ACTG
ACTG
Annualised
ACTG
43.6%
10.3%
TWIN

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026

Metric
ACTG
ACTG
TWIN
TWIN
Revenue
$50.1M
$90.2M
Net Profit
$3.4M
$22.4M
Gross Margin
12.8%
24.8%
Operating Margin
-26.1%
2.3%
Net Margin
6.8%
24.8%
Revenue YoY
2.6%
0.3%
Net Profit YoY
125.5%
2334.3%
EPS (diluted)
$0.03
$1.55

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ACTG
ACTG
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
$50.1M
$90.2M
Q3 25
$59.4M
$80.0M
Q2 25
$51.2M
$96.7M
Q1 25
$124.4M
$81.2M
Q4 24
$48.8M
$89.9M
Q3 24
$23.3M
$72.9M
Q2 24
$25.8M
$84.4M
Q1 24
$24.3M
$74.2M
Net Profit
ACTG
ACTG
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
$3.4M
$22.4M
Q3 25
$-2.7M
$-518.0K
Q2 25
$-3.3M
$1.4M
Q1 25
$24.3M
$-1.5M
Q4 24
$-13.4M
$919.0K
Q3 24
$-14.0M
$-2.8M
Q2 24
$-8.4M
$7.4M
Q1 24
$-186.0K
$3.8M
Gross Margin
ACTG
ACTG
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
12.8%
24.8%
Q3 25
21.2%
28.7%
Q2 25
12.8%
31.0%
Q1 25
47.4%
26.7%
Q4 24
17.6%
24.1%
Q3 24
10.1%
26.5%
Q2 24
26.2%
29.7%
Q1 24
49.2%
28.2%
Operating Margin
ACTG
ACTG
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
-26.1%
2.3%
Q3 25
-10.8%
2.8%
Q2 25
-24.2%
5.5%
Q1 25
30.8%
2.4%
Q4 24
-32.4%
3.1%
Q3 24
-44.1%
-0.2%
Q2 24
-18.4%
5.6%
Q1 24
-8.6%
4.9%
Net Margin
ACTG
ACTG
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
6.8%
24.8%
Q3 25
-4.6%
-0.6%
Q2 25
-6.4%
1.5%
Q1 25
19.5%
-1.8%
Q4 24
-27.5%
1.0%
Q3 24
-60.0%
-3.8%
Q2 24
-32.7%
8.8%
Q1 24
-0.8%
5.2%
EPS (diluted)
ACTG
ACTG
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
$0.03
$1.55
Q3 25
$-0.03
$-0.04
Q2 25
$-0.03
$0.10
Q1 25
$0.25
$-0.11
Q4 24
$-0.14
$0.07
Q3 24
$-0.14
$-0.20
Q2 24
$-0.08
$0.54
Q1 24
$0.00
$0.27

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ACTG
ACTG
TWIN
TWIN
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$306.7M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$91.9M
$44.5M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$543.5M
$184.5M
Total Assets
$771.0M
$384.0M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.17×
0.24×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ACTG
ACTG
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
$306.7M
Q3 25
$301.8M
Q2 25
$316.7M
Q1 25
$272.0M
Q4 24
$273.9M
Q3 24
$410.9M
Q2 24
$441.9M
Q1 24
$498.4M
Total Debt
ACTG
ACTG
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
$91.9M
$44.5M
Q3 25
$43.7M
Q2 25
$31.4M
Q1 25
$40.8M
Q4 24
$24.9M
Q3 24
$29.8M
Q2 24
$25.8M
Q1 24
$17.0M
Stockholders' Equity
ACTG
ACTG
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
$543.5M
$184.5M
Q3 25
$537.6M
$160.3M
Q2 25
$538.6M
$164.0M
Q1 25
$540.2M
$149.5M
Q4 24
$514.8M
$147.0M
Q3 24
$540.2M
$157.5M
Q2 24
$560.7M
$154.7M
Q1 24
$568.3M
$146.3M
Total Assets
ACTG
ACTG
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
$771.0M
$384.0M
Q3 25
$768.9M
$363.5M
Q2 25
$775.5M
$355.6M
Q1 25
$801.6M
$332.9M
Q4 24
$756.4M
$307.4M
Q3 24
$707.6M
$323.5M
Q2 24
$753.6M
$312.1M
Q1 24
$631.7M
$288.8M
Debt / Equity
ACTG
ACTG
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
0.17×
0.24×
Q3 25
0.27×
Q2 25
0.19×
Q1 25
0.27×
Q4 24
0.17×
Q3 24
0.19×
Q2 24
0.17×
Q1 24
0.12×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ACTG
ACTG
TWIN
TWIN
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$75.2M
$4.6M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$1.2M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
1.4%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
3.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
22.01×
0.20×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-70.0K

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ACTG
ACTG
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
$75.2M
$4.6M
Q3 25
$9.5M
$-7.5M
Q2 25
$50.1M
$16.4M
Q1 25
$2.4M
$3.2M
Q4 24
$50.1M
$8.7M
Q3 24
$-593.0K
$-4.3M
Q2 24
$16.1M
$11.4M
Q1 24
$54.8M
$6.2M
Free Cash Flow
ACTG
ACTG
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
$1.2M
Q3 25
$-11.0M
Q2 25
$8.7M
Q1 25
$335.0K
$906.0K
Q4 24
$-98.5M
$5.9M
Q3 24
$-2.8M
$-6.7M
Q2 24
$-126.7M
$10.3M
Q1 24
$54.6M
$4.0M
FCF Margin
ACTG
ACTG
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
1.4%
Q3 25
-13.7%
Q2 25
9.0%
Q1 25
0.3%
1.1%
Q4 24
-201.8%
6.5%
Q3 24
-12.1%
-9.2%
Q2 24
-490.5%
12.2%
Q1 24
224.4%
5.5%
Capex Intensity
ACTG
ACTG
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
3.7%
Q3 25
4.3%
Q2 25
8.0%
Q1 25
1.7%
2.8%
Q4 24
304.4%
3.1%
Q3 24
9.6%
3.2%
Q2 24
553.0%
1.3%
Q1 24
1.1%
2.9%
Cash Conversion
ACTG
ACTG
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
22.01×
0.20×
Q3 25
Q2 25
11.55×
Q1 25
0.10×
Q4 24
9.42×
Q3 24
Q2 24
1.54×
Q1 24
1.63×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

ACTG
ACTG

Energy Operations$16.0M32%
Transportation Safety$10.4M21%
Office Storage And Display Solutions$8.4M17%
Printers Consumables And Parts$6.5M13%
Natural Gas Reserves$5.1M10%
Natural Gas Liquids Reserves$3.3M7%

TWIN
TWIN

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons