vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ADAMAS TRUST, INC. (ADAM) and SolarMax Technology, Inc. (SMXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SolarMax Technology, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($46.6M vs $43.2M, roughly 1.1× ADAMAS TRUST, INC.). ADAMAS TRUST, INC. runs the higher net margin — 124.0% vs -1.9%, a 125.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SolarMax Technology, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (623.5% vs 61.6%).
SolarMax Technology, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells high-efficiency solar PV modules and clean energy systems. It serves residential, commercial and industrial clients in North America and key Asia-Pacific markets, offering installation and after-sales support to boost low-carbon energy use.
ADAM vs SMXT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $43.2M | $46.6M |
| Net Profit | $53.5M | $-872.2K |
| Gross Margin | — | 2.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | -2.7% |
| Net Margin | 124.0% | -1.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 61.6% | 623.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 270.5% | 77.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.45 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $43.2M | $46.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.6M | $30.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.4M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.1M | $6.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.7M | $6.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.2M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $53.5M | $-872.2K | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.8M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.5M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.2M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-31.4M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.8M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-57.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.7% | -25.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -16.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -119.0% | -27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -158.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -124.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -448.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 124.0% | -1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 122.5% | -7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.4% | -27.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 127.4% | -18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -117.5% | -60.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 211.7% | -152.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -81.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -324.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.45 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.36 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.33 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.46 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.36 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.29 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.75 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $210.3M | $8.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $735.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $-12.2M |
| Total Assets | $12.6B | $91.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.52× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $210.3M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $185.3M | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $160.4M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $177.1M | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $167.4M | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $195.1M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $235.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $226.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $735.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $766.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $653.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $654.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $573.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $699.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $800.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $-11.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $-15.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $-15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $-15.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $-10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $12.6B | $91.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.4B | $58.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.6B | $38.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $38.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.2B | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9B | $43.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.52× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.48× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.67× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $134.0M | $-2.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $125.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 291.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 18.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.50× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $134.0M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $39.2M | $220.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.8M | $-601.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.1M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-922.0K | $203.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-993.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-13.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $125.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-19.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 291.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -39.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -42.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -107.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 18.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 92.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.50× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.59× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.02× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ADAM
| Other | $19.6M | 45% |
| Constructive Loans LLC | $14.4M | 33% |
| Multifamily | $9.1M | 21% |
SMXT
| Yabucoa | $35.9M | 77% |
| Other | $10.7M | 23% |
