vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) and Schlumberger (SLB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Schlumberger is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($8.7B vs $6.1B, roughly 1.4× Archer Daniels Midland). Schlumberger runs the higher net margin — 8.6% vs 7.5%, a 1.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Archer Daniels Midland posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (123.5% vs 2.7%). Schlumberger produced more free cash flow last quarter ($103.0M vs $-669.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Schlumberger's revenue compounded faster (-2.3% CAGR vs -47.4%).
The Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, commonly known as ADM, is an American multinational food processing and commodities trading corporation founded in 1902 and headquartered in Chicago, Illinois. The company operates more than 270 plants and 420 crop procurement facilities worldwide, where cereal grains and oilseeds are processed into products used in food, beverage, nutraceutical, industrial, and animal feed markets worldwide.
SLB, formerly known as Schlumberger, is an American multinational oilfield services company. Founded in France in 1926, the company is now incorporated as SLB N.V. in Willemstad, Curaçao, with principal executive offices in four cities: Paris, France; Houston, Texas, United States; London, UK; and The Hague, Netherlands. As of 2022, it is both the world's largest offshore drilling company and the world's largest offshore drilling contractor by revenue.
ADM vs SLB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.1B | $8.7B |
| Net Profit | $456.0M | $752.0M |
| Gross Margin | 20.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 7.9% | — |
| Net Margin | 7.5% | 8.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 123.5% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -19.6% | -5.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.95 | $0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $8.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.1B | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3B | $8.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.1B | $8.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-25.7B | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.0B | $9.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.2B | $9.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $752.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $456.0M | $824.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.0M | $739.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $219.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $295.0M | $797.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $567.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $486.0M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.9% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.3% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.4% | 15.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | 12.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 15.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.7% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | 11.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.8% | 9.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.2% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 12.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.50 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.95 | $0.53 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.22 | $0.50 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.45 | $0.74 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.61 | $0.58 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.21 | $0.77 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.04 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.98 | $0.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.0B | $3.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $7.6B | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $22.7B | $27.4B |
| Total Assets | $52.4B | $19.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | 0.35× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $571.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $511.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $864.0M | $961.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $611.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $784.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $764.0M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $27.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.7B | $26.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.5B | $25.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.4B | $20.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.1B | $19.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.2B | $21.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.0B | $21.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.2B | $21.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $19.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $52.4B | $54.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.9B | $55.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.0B | $48.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $53.4B | $49.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $53.3B | $48.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.2B | $49.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.7B | $49.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-313.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-669.0M | $103.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -11.1% | 1.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.69× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $4.2B | $4.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-313.0M | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-342.0M | $660.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $322.0M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $468.0M | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $103.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-669.0M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $771.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-633.0M | $262.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-170.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $919.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $106.0M | $973.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -11.1% | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.6% | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 63.0% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.3% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.7% | 19.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.3% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | 10.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.9% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.8% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.9% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.4% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 5.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.69× | 3.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.75× | 2.28× | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.63× | 1.13× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.16× | 0.83× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.57× | 2.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | 72.22× | 2.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.96× | 1.29× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ADM
| Starchesandsweeteners | $1.4B | 23% |
| Ag Services | $1.1B | 18% |
| Human Nutrition | $961.0M | 16% |
| Refined Productsand Other | $924.0M | 15% |
| Animal Nutrition | $825.0M | 14% |
| Vantage Corn Processors | $700.0M | 12% |
| Transferred Over Time | $176.0M | 3% |
| Crushing | $59.0M | 1% |
SLB
Segment breakdown not available.
