vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Adient plc (ADNT) and CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE (CM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.1B vs $3.6B, roughly 1.7× Adient plc). CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE runs the higher net margin — 36.9% vs -0.6%, a 37.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Adient plc is an American, Irish-domiciled company that operates as the largest manufacturer of automotive seating for customers worldwide and is based in Plymouth, Michigan, United States.
The Imperial Bank of Canada was a Canadian bank that operated from 1873 to 1961. In 1961, Imperial merged with the Canadian Bank of Commerce to become the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce.
ADNT vs CM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.6B | $6.1B |
| Net Profit | $-22.0M | $2.3B |
| Gross Margin | 6.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.1% | — |
| Net Margin | -0.6% | 36.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.28 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $5.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $-22.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-335.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-11.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 28.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 28.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.28 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.17 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.43 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.99 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.88 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $8.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.7B | $47.9B |
| Total Assets | $8.8B | $826.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.37× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $8.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $13.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $47.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $45.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $45.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $826.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0B | $804.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.8B | $795.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.34× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.12× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.24× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $80.0M | $-1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $15.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.69× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $174.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $80.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $213.0M | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $172.0M | $667.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-45.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $263.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $158.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $134.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-90.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $191.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -0.69× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.83× | 2.80× | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.78× | 0.46× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.33× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
