vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Adient plc (ADNT) and Vistra Corp. (VST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Vistra Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.8B vs $3.6B, roughly 1.3× Adient plc). Vistra Corp. runs the higher net margin — 4.8% vs -0.6%, a 5.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vistra Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (31.2% vs 4.3%). Vistra Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($596.0M vs $15.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Vistra Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (23.3% CAGR vs -1.4%).
Adient plc is an American, Irish-domiciled company that operates as the largest manufacturer of automotive seating for customers worldwide and is based in Plymouth, Michigan, United States.
Vistra may refer to either of two companies:Vistra, a corporate services company based in Hong Kong Vistra Corp, an energy company based in Texas
ADNT vs VST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.6B | $4.8B |
| Net Profit | $-22.0M | $233.0M |
| Gross Margin | 6.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.1% | 9.9% |
| Net Margin | -0.6% | 4.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.3% | 31.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -47.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.28 | $0.55 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.6B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6B | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8B | $3.2B |
| Q4 25 | $-22.0M | $233.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.0M | $652.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.0M | $327.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-335.0M | $-268.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | $441.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-11.0M | $365.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-70.0M | $-35.0M |
| Q4 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.7% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.3% | -2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 59.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 22.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.1% | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | -0.6% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.3% | -6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 43.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.3% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.9% | -1.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.28 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.17 | $1.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.43 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.99 | $-0.93 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.00 | $1.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.88 | $5.25 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | $0.90 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.77 | $-0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $785.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.4B | $15.8B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.7B | $5.1B |
| Total Assets | $8.8B | $41.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.37× | 3.11× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $785.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $602.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $458.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $561.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $905.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $15.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $15.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $15.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $15.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $15.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $13.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $13.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4B | $14.7B |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $5.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $5.7B |
| Q4 25 | $8.8B | $41.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0B | $38.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.8B | $38.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.6B | $38.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5B | $37.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.4B | $37.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.1B | $39.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.3B | $38.2B |
| Q4 25 | 1.37× | 3.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.35× | 3.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.34× | 3.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.44× | 3.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.28× | 2.77× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.12× | 2.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.24× | 2.49× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.16× | 2.60× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $80.0M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $15.0M | $596.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.4% | 12.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | 17.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 6.15× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $174.0M | $1.3B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $80.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $213.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $172.0M | $572.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-45.0M | $599.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $263.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $158.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.0M | $312.0M |
| Q4 25 | $15.0M | $596.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $134.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.0M | $-118.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-90.0M | $-169.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.0M | $923.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $191.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.0M | $698.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.0M | $-153.0M |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | 21.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | -3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.5% | -4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | 25.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.4% | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | 19.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.3% | -4.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | 17.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 18.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 14.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.83× | 2.25× | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.78× | 1.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.33× | 0.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.28× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ADNT
Segment breakdown not available.
VST
| Retail Energy Charge In ERCOT | $2.1B | 43% |
| Retail Energy Charge In Northeast Midwest | $1.2B | 24% |
| East Segment | $1.1B | 24% |
| Hedging Revenue Realized | $170.0M | 4% |
| Revenue From Other Wholesale Contracts | $116.0M | 2% |
| Transferable Production Tax Credit Revenues | $78.0M | 2% |
| West Segment | $77.0M | 2% |
| Intersegment Sales | $25.0M | 1% |
