vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Automatic Data Processing (ADP) and TIMKEN CO (TKR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Automatic Data Processing is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.4B vs $1.1B, roughly 4.8× TIMKEN CO). Automatic Data Processing runs the higher net margin — 19.8% vs 5.6%, a 14.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Automatic Data Processing posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.2% vs 3.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Automatic Data Processing's revenue compounded faster (1.0% CAGR vs -3.4%).
Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) is an American multinational provider of cloud-based human resources management, payroll processing, and professional employer organization (PEO) services, headquartered in Roseland, New Jersey.
The Timken Company is a global manufacturer of engineered bearings and industrial motion products. Headquartered in North Canton, Ohio, the company operates from 45 countries.
ADP vs TKR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.4B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $1.1B | $62.3M |
| Gross Margin | 46.1% | 29.3% |
| Operating Margin | 25.8% | 9.8% |
| Net Margin | 19.8% | 5.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.2% | 3.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.3% | -12.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $0.89 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $62.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $69.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $910.7M | $78.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $78.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $963.2M | $71.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $956.3M | $81.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $829.3M | $96.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $103.5M |
| Q4 25 | 46.1% | 29.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.2% | 30.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.1% | 30.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.7% | 31.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.7% | 30.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.5% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.8% | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.3% | 33.4% |
| Q4 25 | 25.8% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.3% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.2% | 12.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.2% | 12.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.0% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.6% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.8% | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.4% | 15.5% |
| Q4 25 | 19.8% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.8% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.5% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.1% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.8% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.4% | 8.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.6% | 8.7% |
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | $0.89 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.49 | $0.99 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.23 | $1.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.06 | $1.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.35 | $1.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.34 | $1.16 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.01 | $1.36 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.88 | $1.46 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.5B | $364.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.4B | $3.2B |
| Total Assets | $84.6B | $6.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.60× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $364.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9B | $449.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.8B | $419.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $376.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $373.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $412.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $469.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3B | $421.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | $6.4B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.2B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9B | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.6B | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | $84.6B | $6.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.3B | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.4B | $6.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.4B | $6.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.1B | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.5B | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.4B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $64.2B | $6.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.77× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.83× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.1B | $183.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $140.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 12.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.07× | 2.94× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $406.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $183.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $642.3M | $201.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $111.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $58.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $178.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $824.4M | $123.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $124.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $49.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $140.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $163.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $78.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $23.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $125.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $88.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $87.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | 1.07× | 2.94× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.63× | 2.90× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.58× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.22× | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.19× | 2.51× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.86× | 1.51× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.57× | 1.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.26× | 0.48× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ADP
| HCM | $2.2B | 42% |
| PEO Zero Margin Benefits Pass Throughs | $1.1B | 21% |
| HRO | $979.3M | 18% |
| Global | $709.3M | 13% |
| Interest On Funds Held For Clients | $308.6M | 6% |
TKR
Segment breakdown not available.
