vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Automatic Data Processing (ADP) and United Maritime Corp (USEA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Automatic Data Processing is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.4B vs $1.8M, roughly 2931.8× United Maritime Corp). United Maritime Corp runs the higher net margin — 59.6% vs 19.8%, a 39.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) is an American multinational provider of cloud-based human resources management, payroll processing, and professional employer organization (PEO) services, headquartered in Roseland, New Jersey.
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. is a multinational, vertically integrated seaborne shipping and logistics company focused on the transport and transshipment of drybulk commodities including iron ore, coal and grain.
ADP vs USEA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 2026 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.4B | $1.8M |
| Net Profit | $1.1B | $1.1M |
| Gross Margin | 46.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 25.8% | — |
| Net Margin | 19.8% | 59.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.2% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2B | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $910.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $963.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $956.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $829.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | 46.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 25.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | 59.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.49 | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.23 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.06 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.35 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.34 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.01 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.88 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.5B | $19.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $49.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.4B | $57.5M |
| Total Assets | $84.6B | $144.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.86× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9B | $19.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $49.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $6.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $57.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | $84.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.3B | $144.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $64.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.1B | $-444.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-477.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -26.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.07× | -0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $642.3M | $-444.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $824.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-477.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -26.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.63× | -0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.58× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.22× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.57× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.26× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ADP
| HCM | $2.2B | 42% |
| PEO Zero Margin Benefits Pass Throughs | $1.1B | 21% |
| HRO | $979.3M | 18% |
| Global | $709.3M | 13% |
| Interest On Funds Held For Clients | $308.6M | 6% |
USEA
Segment breakdown not available.
