vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Autodesk (ADSK) and Camping World Holdings, Inc. (CWH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Autodesk is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.7× Camping World Holdings, Inc.). Autodesk runs the higher net margin — 16.1% vs -9.3%, a 25.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, Autodesk's revenue compounded faster (14.0% CAGR vs -7.2%).
Autodesk, Inc. is an American multinational software corporation that provides software products and services for the architecture, engineering, construction, manufacturing, media, education, and entertainment industries. Autodesk is headquartered in San Francisco, California, and has offices worldwide. Its U.S. offices are located in the states of California, Oregon, Colorado, Texas, Michigan, New Hampshire and Massachusetts.
Camping World Holdings, Inc. is an American corporation specializing in selling recreational vehicles (RVs), recreational vehicle parts, and recreational vehicle service. They also sell supplies for camping. The company has its headquarters in Lincolnshire, Illinois. In October 2016 it became a publicly traded company when it raised $251 million in an IPO. Camping World has 202 locations. In addition to its RV dealerships and accessories stores, the company sells goods through phone order and...
ADSK vs CWH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2027 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $316.0M | $-109.1M |
| Gross Margin | 91.5% | 28.8% |
| Operating Margin | 22.0% | -4.3% |
| Net Margin | 16.1% | -9.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -2.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4.3% | -83.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.48 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | $316.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $343.0M | $-109.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $313.0M | $-40.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.0M | $30.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $303.0M | $-12.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $275.0M | $-59.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.0M | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.8M |
| Q1 26 | 91.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 91.1% | 28.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 91.0% | 28.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 90.2% | 30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 90.6% | 30.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 90.6% | 31.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 90.7% | 28.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.3% |
| Q1 26 | 22.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.4% | -4.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.2% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.0% | -1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | 16.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.5% | -9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.8% | -2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.5% | -0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | -4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.5% |
| Q1 26 | $1.47 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.60 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.46 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.70 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.39 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.27 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.30 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.2B | $215.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.0B | $228.6M |
| Total Assets | $12.5B | $5.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 6.44× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $215.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $230.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $118.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $20.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $208.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $23.7M |
| Q1 26 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $228.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $296.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $340.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $310.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $326.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $151.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $149.7M |
| Q1 26 | $12.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.2B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.9B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.6B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.8B | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.1B | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.0B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.0B |
| Q1 26 | 0.82× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.86× | 6.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.92× | 5.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.88× | 4.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.88× | 4.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.88× | 4.64× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.93× | 10.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.28× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.5B | $-227.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $972.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 49.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.76× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.8B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $989.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $439.0M | $-227.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $460.0M | $139.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $564.0M | $187.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $692.0M | $-232.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $209.0M | $-163.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $212.0M | $324.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $152.3M |
| Q1 26 | $972.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $430.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $451.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $556.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $678.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $199.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $203.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 49.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 3.13× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.71× | 6.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.28× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.76× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.75× | 58.93× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.59× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ADSK
| AECO | $975.0M | 50% |
| AutoCAD and AutoCAD LT | $478.0M | 24% |
| MFG | $381.0M | 19% |
| M&E | $90.0M | 5% |
CWH
| New Vehicles | $457.8M | 39% |
| Used Vehicles | $386.5M | 33% |
| Products Service And Other | $160.5M | 14% |
| Finance And Insurance Net | $111.4M | 9% |
| Good Sam Services And Plans | $48.0M | 4% |
| Good Sam Club | $10.5M | 1% |
