vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ameren (AEE) and Academy Sports & Outdoors, Inc. (ASO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ameren is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.3× Academy Sports & Outdoors, Inc.). Ameren runs the higher net margin — 14.2% vs 5.2%, a 9.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Academy Sports & Outdoors, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.0% vs -8.2%). Academy Sports & Outdoors, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-13.6M vs $-54.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Ameren's revenue compounded faster (-0.9% CAGR vs -12.2%).
Ameren Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, operates as a public utility holding company in the United States. It operates through four segments: Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution, Ameren Illinois Natural Gas, and Ameren Transmission. The company engages in the rate-regulated electric generation, transmission, and distribution activities; and rate-regulated natural gas distribution and transmission businesses. It primarily generates electricity through coal, nucle...
Academy Sports + Outdoors is an American sporting-goods store chain with corporate offices in the Katy Distribution Center in unincorporated western Harris County, Texas, United States, near Katy and west of Houston. For 74 years, it was a privately held company owned by the Gochman family, until its May 2011 acquisition by Kohlberg Kravis Roberts. In October 2020, it was listed on NASDAQ.
AEE vs ASO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $253.0M | $71.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.7% |
| Operating Margin | 20.2% | 7.3% |
| Net Margin | 14.2% | 5.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -8.2% | 3.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.6% | 8.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.92 | $1.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $253.0M | $71.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $641.0M | $125.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $277.0M | $46.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $290.0M | $133.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $208.0M | $65.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $457.0M | $142.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.0M | $76.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $262.0M | $168.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 35.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 34.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 34.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 33.3% |
| Q4 25 | 20.2% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.6% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.5% | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.5% | 9.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.0% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.3% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.4% | 11.4% |
| Q4 25 | 14.2% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | 8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.4% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.4% | 9.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.92 | $1.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.35 | $1.85 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.01 | $0.68 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.07 | $1.85 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.77 | $0.92 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.70 | $1.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.97 | $1.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.98 | $2.19 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.0M | $289.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $19.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $13.4B | $2.1B |
| Total Assets | $48.5B | $5.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.45× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $13.0M | $289.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0M | $300.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.0M | $285.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.0M | $288.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $296.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.0M | $324.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.0M | $378.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $85.0M | $347.9M |
| Q4 25 | $19.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.4B | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | $48.5B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.4B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.6B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.7B | $4.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.6B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.3B | $4.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.3B | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $41.3B | $4.7B |
| Q4 25 | 1.45× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $956.0M | $49.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-54.0M | $-13.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.0% | -1.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 56.7% | 4.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.78× | 0.68× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-775.0M | $191.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $956.0M | $49.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $78.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $862.0M | $157.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | $140.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $817.0M | $96.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $897.0M | $91.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $557.0M | $199.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $492.0M | $234.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-54.0M | $-13.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.0M | $21.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-204.0M | $106.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-633.0M | $76.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-473.0M | $34.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-240.0M | $50.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-445.0M | $167.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-398.0M | $178.9M |
| Q4 25 | -3.0% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.2% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.2% | 4.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -24.4% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.0% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.3% | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.9% | 10.0% |
| Q4 25 | 56.7% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.0% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 66.5% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.3% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.2% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 49.0% | 3.1% |
| Q4 25 | 3.78× | 0.68× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | 0.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.11× | 3.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.49× | 1.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.93× | 1.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.96× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.14× | 2.61× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.88× | 1.40× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AEE
Segment breakdown not available.
ASO
| Outdoors | $445.1M | 32% |
| Apparel | $349.8M | 25% |
| Footwear | $292.4M | 21% |
| Sports And Recreation | $288.7M | 21% |
| Other | $7.6M | 1% |
