vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ameren (AEE) and Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ameren is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.7B, roughly 1.1× Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.). Ameren runs the higher net margin — 14.2% vs 5.9%, a 8.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.2% vs -8.2%).
Ameren Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, operates as a public utility holding company in the United States. It operates through four segments: Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution, Ameren Illinois Natural Gas, and Ameren Transmission. The company engages in the rate-regulated electric generation, transmission, and distribution activities; and rate-regulated natural gas distribution and transmission businesses. It primarily generates electricity through coal, nucle...
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.BEPEarnings & Financial Report
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
AEE vs BEP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q2 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $1.7B |
| Net Profit | $253.0M | $100.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 20.2% | — |
| Net Margin | 14.2% | 5.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -8.2% | 14.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.6% | 213.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.92 | $-0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | $253.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $641.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $277.0M | $100.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $290.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $208.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $457.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.0M | $-88.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $262.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 20.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.4% | -5.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.92 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.35 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.01 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.07 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.77 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.70 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.97 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.98 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.0M | $1.9B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $19.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $13.4B | $33.3B |
| Total Assets | $48.5B | $98.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.45× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $13.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $85.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $19.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3B | $33.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5B | $28.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | $48.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.6B | $98.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.3B | $73.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $41.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.45× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $956.0M | $379.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-54.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 56.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.78× | 3.79× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-775.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $956.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $862.0M | $379.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $817.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $897.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $557.0M | $231.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $492.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-54.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-204.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-633.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-473.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-240.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-445.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-398.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | -3.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -24.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 56.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 66.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 49.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.78× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.11× | 3.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.93× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.96× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.14× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.88× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
