vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ameren (AEE) and LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC (LSTR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ameren is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.5× LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC). Ameren runs the higher net margin — 14.2% vs 3.4%, a 10.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.6% vs -8.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Ameren's revenue compounded faster (-0.9% CAGR vs -2.2%).
Ameren Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, operates as a public utility holding company in the United States. It operates through four segments: Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution, Ameren Illinois Natural Gas, and Ameren Transmission. The company engages in the rate-regulated electric generation, transmission, and distribution activities; and rate-regulated natural gas distribution and transmission businesses. It primarily generates electricity through coal, nucle...
Landstar System, Inc. is an American transportation services company specializing in logistics and, more specifically, third-party logistics. Landstar utilizes an extensive network of over 8,800 independent owner-operators, referred to internally as business capacity owners (BCOs), over 1,000 independent freight agents, and over 70,000 vetted carriers. Landstar provides services principally throughout the United States and to a lesser extent in Canada and between the U.S. and Canada, Mexico, ...
AEE vs LSTR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $253.0M | $39.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 9.6% |
| Operating Margin | 20.2% | 4.5% |
| Net Margin | 14.2% | 3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -8.2% | 1.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.6% | 32.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.92 | $1.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $39.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $253.0M | $23.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $641.0M | $19.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $277.0M | $41.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $290.0M | $29.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $208.0M | $46.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $457.0M | $50.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.0M | $52.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.2% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.6% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.5% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.5% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.0% | 5.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.3% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.7% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.4% | 4.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.16 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.92 | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.35 | $0.56 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.01 | $1.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.07 | $0.85 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.77 | $1.30 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.70 | $1.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.97 | $1.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.0M | $411.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $19.4B | $26.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $13.4B | $799.0M |
| Total Assets | $48.5B | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.45× | 0.03× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $411.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.0M | $452.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0M | $434.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.0M | $426.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.0M | $473.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $566.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.0M | $531.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.0M | $504.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $26.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.4B | $0 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.8B | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0 |
| Q1 26 | — | $799.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | $795.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8B | $888.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3B | $921.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.2B | $930.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.1B | $972.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $48.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.3B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.45× | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.47× | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.00× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $956.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-54.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 56.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.78× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-775.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $956.0M | $72.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $89.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $862.0M | $7.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | $55.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $817.0M | $61.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $897.0M | $83.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $557.0M | $48.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-54.0M | $70.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.0M | $86.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-204.0M | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-633.0M | $53.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-473.0M | $54.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-240.0M | $75.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-445.0M | $40.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.0% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.2% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -24.4% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.0% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.3% | 3.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 56.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 66.5% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.3% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.2% | 0.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.78× | 3.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | 4.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.11× | 0.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.49× | 1.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.93× | 1.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.96× | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.14× | 0.91× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
