vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AEHR TEST SYSTEMS (AEHR) and Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Five Point Holdings, LLC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.6M vs $9.9M, roughly 1.4× AEHR TEST SYSTEMS). Five Point Holdings, LLC runs the higher net margin — -16.4% vs -32.7%, a 16.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Five Point Holdings, LLC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs -26.5%). Over the past eight quarters, AEHR TEST SYSTEMS's revenue compounded faster (14.3% CAGR vs -48.5%).
Aehr Test Systems designs, manufactures and sells advanced test and burn-in systems for the global semiconductor industry. Its products help semiconductor manufacturers, packaging firms and chip designers validate reliability of logic, memory and power semiconductor devices, serving markets across North America, Asia and Europe.
Five Point Holdings, LLC is a leading U.S. real estate development company that focuses on planning and constructing large-scale master-planned mixed-use communities in high-demand markets across California. Its projects integrate residential housing, commercial office spaces, retail outlets, public amenities and recreational facilities to build vibrant, sustainable living and working environments for local populations.
AEHR vs FPH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.9M | $13.6M |
| Net Profit | $-3.2M | $-2.2M |
| Gross Margin | 25.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | -47.0% | -43.5% |
| Net Margin | -32.7% | -16.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -26.5% | 3.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -214.2% | -109.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $13.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.9M | $75.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.0M | $13.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.1M | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.3M | $13.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.5M | $159.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.1M | $17.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.6M | $51.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-3.2M | $58.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.1M | $21.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.9M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-643.0K | $23.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.0M | $121.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $660.0K | $4.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.9M | $14.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -43.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -47.0% | 89.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.2% | 87.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 83.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.3% | 86.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | -16.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | -32.7% | 77.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.0% | 156.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.6% | 44.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.5% | 177.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.6% | 75.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 143.8% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.81 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $30.8M | $332.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $130.8M | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $148.7M | $3.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $332.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $30.8M | $425.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.7M | $351.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.5M | $456.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.4M | $528.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.2M | $430.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.8M | $224.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.2M | $217.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $130.8M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.4M | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.9M | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $124.2M | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $123.2M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $122.5M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $111.6M | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $148.7M | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $144.1M | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $148.5M | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $145.6M | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $142.3M | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $145.9M | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $127.9M | $2.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.2M | $-44.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -16.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.7% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-11.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-44.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | $105.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-282.0K | $40.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $-71.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | $56.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.9M | $116.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4M | $-18.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | $-23.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.6M | $105.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.1M | $-71.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | $56.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.2M | $115.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2M | $-18.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | $-23.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -16.6% | 138.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -15.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -36.3% | -959.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.8% | 430.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -46.0% | 72.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.6% | -106.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | -46.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.79× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.92× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -21.58× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.61× | -3.77× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.05× | -1.58× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AEHR
| Systems | $5.0M | 50% |
| Contactors | $3.4M | 35% |
| Services | $1.5M | 15% |
FPH
Segment breakdown not available.
