vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AEHR TEST SYSTEMS (AEHR) and TRANSCAT INC (TRNS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TRANSCAT INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($83.9M vs $9.9M, roughly 8.5× AEHR TEST SYSTEMS). TRANSCAT INC runs the higher net margin — -1.3% vs -32.7%, a 31.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TRANSCAT INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.6% vs -26.5%). TRANSCAT INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($9.5M vs $-1.6M). Over the past eight quarters, AEHR TEST SYSTEMS's revenue compounded faster (14.3% CAGR vs 8.7%).
Aehr Test Systems designs, manufactures and sells advanced test and burn-in systems for the global semiconductor industry. Its products help semiconductor manufacturers, packaging firms and chip designers validate reliability of logic, memory and power semiconductor devices, serving markets across North America, Asia and Europe.
Transcat Inc is a leading provider of calibration and measurement compliance solutions, as well as a distributor of professional test and measurement instruments. It serves core sectors including life sciences, aerospace, industrial manufacturing, energy and utilities, with primary operations across the United States and Canada, helping clients meet regulatory and operational accuracy requirements.
AEHR vs TRNS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q3 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.9M | $83.9M |
| Net Profit | $-3.2M | $-1.1M |
| Gross Margin | 25.7% | 30.1% |
| Operating Margin | -47.0% | 0.1% |
| Net Margin | -32.7% | -1.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -26.5% | 25.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -214.2% | -146.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $-0.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.9M | $83.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.0M | $82.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.1M | $76.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.3M | $77.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.5M | $66.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.1M | $67.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.6M | $66.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.6M | $70.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.2M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.1M | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.9M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-643.0K | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.0M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $660.0K | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.9M | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.5M | $6.9M |
| Q4 25 | 25.7% | 30.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.9% | 32.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.3% | 33.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.2% | 33.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.1% | 29.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.0% | 31.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.9% | 34.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 41.7% | 33.9% |
| Q4 25 | -47.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.1% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.7% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.1% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.2% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.3% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -27.1% | 13.0% |
| Q4 25 | -32.7% | -1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.0% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.6% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.5% | 5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.6% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 143.8% | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -19.4% | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $0.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.10 | $0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.03 | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.81 | $0.48 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.05 | $0.81 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $30.8M | $3.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $130.8M | $296.8M |
| Total Assets | $148.7M | $472.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $30.8M | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.7M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.5M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.4M | $1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.2M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.8M | $23.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.2M | $22.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $47.6M | $35.2M |
| Q4 25 | $130.8M | $296.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.4M | $295.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.9M | $292.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $124.2M | $286.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $123.2M | $281.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $122.5M | $268.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $111.6M | $262.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $86.5M | $225.2M |
| Q4 25 | $148.7M | $472.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $144.1M | $484.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $148.5M | $392.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $145.6M | $385.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $142.3M | $386.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $145.9M | $323.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $127.9M | $323.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.6M | $287.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.2M | $12.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.6M | $9.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -16.6% | 11.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.7% | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-11.7M | $24.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | $12.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-282.0K | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | $10.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.9M | $12.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4M | $6.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | $8.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.8M | $5.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.6M | $9.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.1M | $-975.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | $7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.2M | $9.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2M | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.1M | $1.5M |
| Q4 25 | -16.6% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -15.3% | 10.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -36.3% | -1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.8% | 10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -46.0% | 14.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.6% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -40.8% | 2.2% |
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.7% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.0% | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | 5.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.11× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.38× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.61× | 2.08× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.05× | 2.02× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AEHR
| Systems | $5.0M | 50% |
| Contactors | $3.4M | 35% |
| Services | $1.5M | 15% |
TRNS
Segment breakdown not available.
