vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AEHR TEST SYSTEMS (AEHR) and UTAH MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC (UTMD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AEHR TEST SYSTEMS is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.9M vs $9.0M, roughly 1.1× UTAH MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC). UTAH MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC runs the higher net margin — 28.4% vs -32.7%, a 61.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UTAH MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.2% vs -26.5%). UTAH MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($3.4M vs $-1.6M). Over the past eight quarters, AEHR TEST SYSTEMS's revenue compounded faster (14.3% CAGR vs -10.7%).
Aehr Test Systems designs, manufactures and sells advanced test and burn-in systems for the global semiconductor industry. Its products help semiconductor manufacturers, packaging firms and chip designers validate reliability of logic, memory and power semiconductor devices, serving markets across North America, Asia and Europe.
Varian Medical Systems is an American radiation oncology treatments and software maker based in Palo Alto, California. Their medical devices include linear accelerators (LINACs) and software for treating cancer and other medical conditions with radiotherapy, radiosurgery, proton therapy, and brachytherapy. The company supplies software for managing cancer clinics, radiotherapy centers, and medical oncology practices. Varian Medical Systems employs more than 7,100 people at manufacturing sites...
AEHR vs UTMD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.9M | $9.0M |
| Net Profit | $-3.2M | $2.6M |
| Gross Margin | 25.7% | 58.2% |
| Operating Margin | -47.0% | 27.0% |
| Net Margin | -32.7% | 28.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -26.5% | -1.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -214.2% | -11.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $0.80 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.9M | $9.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.0M | $9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.1M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.3M | $9.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.5M | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.1M | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.6M | $10.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.6M | $11.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.2M | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.1M | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.9M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-643.0K | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.0M | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $660.0K | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.9M | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.5M | $4.0M |
| Q4 25 | 25.7% | 58.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.9% | 57.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.3% | 56.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.2% | 57.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.1% | 58.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.0% | 58.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.9% | 60.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 41.7% | 59.7% |
| Q4 25 | -47.0% | 27.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.1% | 26.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.7% | 32.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.1% | 32.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.2% | 32.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 33.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.3% | 33.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -27.1% | 34.2% |
| Q4 25 | -32.7% | 28.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.0% | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.6% | 30.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.5% | 31.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.6% | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 35.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 143.8% | 33.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -19.4% | 34.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $0.80 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $0.82 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.10 | $0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $0.92 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.03 | $0.86 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | $1.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.81 | $0.98 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.05 | $1.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $30.8M | $85.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $225.0K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $130.8M | $119.3M |
| Total Assets | $148.7M | $122.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $30.8M | $85.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.7M | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.5M | $82.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.4M | $83.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.2M | $83.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.8M | $88.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.2M | $89.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $47.6M | $93.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $225.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $269.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $282.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $130.8M | $119.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.4M | $118.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.9M | $117.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $124.2M | $117.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $123.2M | $117.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $122.5M | $124.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $111.6M | $124.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $86.5M | $127.7M |
| Q4 25 | $148.7M | $122.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $144.1M | $122.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $148.5M | $120.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $145.6M | $122.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $142.3M | $122.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $145.9M | $129.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $127.9M | $130.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.6M | $135.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.2M | $3.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.6M | $3.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -16.6% | 37.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.7% | 1.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.36× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-11.7M | $14.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-282.0K | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.9M | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4M | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.8M | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.6M | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.1M | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.2M | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2M | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.1M | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | -16.6% | 37.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -15.3% | 39.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -36.3% | 28.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.8% | 44.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -46.0% | 32.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.6% | 37.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -40.8% | 46.3% |
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.47× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.94× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.01× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.61× | 1.08× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.05× | 0.80× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.33× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AEHR
| Systems | $5.0M | 50% |
| Contactors | $3.4M | 35% |
| Services | $1.5M | 15% |
UTMD
Segment breakdown not available.
