vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALLIANCE ENTERTAINMENT HOLDING CORP (AENT) and National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ALLIANCE ENTERTAINMENT HOLDING CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($368.7M vs $187.0M, roughly 2.0× National Storage Affiliates Trust). National Storage Affiliates Trust runs the higher net margin — 12.2% vs 2.5%, a 9.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, National Storage Affiliates Trust posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.6% vs -6.3%). National Storage Affiliates Trust produced more free cash flow last quarter ($299.8M vs $-16.9M). Over the past eight quarters, ALLIANCE ENTERTAINMENT HOLDING CORP's revenue compounded faster (32.1% CAGR vs -2.4%).
Alliance Atlantis Communications Inc. was a media company that operated primarily as a specialty service provider in Canada. Primarily based in Toronto, Alliance Atlantis also had offices in Halifax, Los Angeles, London, Dublin, Madrid, Barcelona, Shannon, and Sydney.
National Storage Affiliates Trust is a U.S.-headquartered real estate investment trust focused on self-storage assets. It owns, operates and acquires self-storage facilities across dozens of U.S. states, offering secure storage solutions for residential and commercial customers.
AENT vs NSA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $368.7M | $187.0M |
| Net Profit | $9.4M | $22.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 72.5% |
| Operating Margin | 4.7% | 20.2% |
| Net Margin | 2.5% | 12.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -6.3% | -1.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 32.8% | 36.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $368.7M | $187.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $254.0M | $188.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $227.8M | $188.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $213.0M | $188.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $393.7M | $190.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $229.0M | $193.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $236.9M | $190.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $211.2M | $196.1M |
| Q4 25 | $9.4M | $22.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.9M | $18.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8M | $19.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1M | $16.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $397.0K | $18.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5M | $17.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.4M | $59.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 72.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 70.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 70.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 70.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 72.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 72.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 72.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 72.1% |
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 16.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 11.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.3% | 48.9% |
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.6% | 30.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.18 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.10 | $0.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.14 | $0.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.01 | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.05 | $0.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | $0.65 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $23.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $117.6M | $946.0M |
| Total Assets | $434.1M | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $26.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $26.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $19.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $50.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3M | $69.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1M | $59.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6M | $64.2M |
| Q4 25 | $117.6M | $946.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.1M | $973.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $103.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $95.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.0M | $986.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $85.1M | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $434.1M | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $361.2M | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $349.4M | $5.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $401.7M | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $395.7M | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $340.8M | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $324.0M | $5.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-16.5M | $338.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-16.9M | $299.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -4.6% | 160.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 20.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -1.76× | 14.79× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-1.4M | $541.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-16.5M | $338.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7M | $100.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.7M | $79.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5M | $85.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.3M | $363.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.6M | $105.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7M | $83.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.0M | $94.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-16.9M | $299.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4M | $88.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.7M | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | $79.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $344.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.6M | $101.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $79.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.0M | $88.6M |
| Q4 25 | -4.6% | 160.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 46.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.7% | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 42.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 181.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.1% | 52.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.4% | 45.2% |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | -1.76× | 14.79× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.56× | 5.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.86× | 4.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.33× | 6.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.57× | 21.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | -29.31× | 5.65× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.85× | 4.88× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.59× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
