vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALLIANCE ENTERTAINMENT HOLDING CORP (AENT) and PROSPERITY BANCSHARES INC (PB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ALLIANCE ENTERTAINMENT HOLDING CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($368.7M vs $275.0M, roughly 1.3× PROSPERITY BANCSHARES INC). PROSPERITY BANCSHARES INC runs the higher net margin — 50.9% vs 2.5%, a 48.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PROSPERITY BANCSHARES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.7% vs -6.3%). PROSPERITY BANCSHARES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($68.5M vs $-16.9M). Over the past eight quarters, ALLIANCE ENTERTAINMENT HOLDING CORP's revenue compounded faster (32.1% CAGR vs 7.4%).
Alliance Atlantis Communications Inc. was a media company that operated primarily as a specialty service provider in Canada. Primarily based in Toronto, Alliance Atlantis also had offices in Halifax, Los Angeles, London, Dublin, Madrid, Barcelona, Shannon, and Sydney.
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. is a bank holding company headquartered in Houston, Texas with operations in Texas and central Oklahoma. As of December 31, 2019, the company operated 285 branches: 65 in the Houston area, including The Woodlands, Texas; 30 in South Texas, including Corpus Christi, Texas and Victoria, Texas; 75 in the Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex; 22 in East Texas; 29 in Central Texas, including Austin, Texas and San Antonio; 34 in West Texas, including Lubbock, Texas, Midland–Odess...
AENT vs PB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $368.7M | $275.0M |
| Net Profit | $9.4M | $139.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.7% | 65.1% |
| Net Margin | 2.5% | 50.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -6.3% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 32.8% | 7.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $1.48 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $368.7M | $275.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $254.0M | $273.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $227.8M | $267.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $213.0M | $265.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $393.7M | $267.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $229.0M | $261.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $236.9M | $258.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $211.2M | $238.2M |
| Q4 25 | $9.4M | $139.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.9M | $137.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8M | $135.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | $130.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1M | $130.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $397.0K | $127.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5M | $111.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.4M | $110.4M |
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | 65.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 64.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 64.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 62.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 62.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 62.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 55.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.3% | 59.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 50.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 50.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 50.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 49.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | 48.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 43.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.6% | 46.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.18 | $1.48 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.10 | $1.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $1.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $1.37 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.14 | $1.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.01 | $1.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.05 | $1.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | $1.18 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $117.6M | $7.6B |
| Total Assets | $434.1M | $38.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $117.6M | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.1M | $7.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $103.2M | $7.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.4M | $7.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $95.6M | $7.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.0M | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.6M | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $85.1M | $7.1B |
| Q4 25 | $434.1M | $38.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $383.0M | $38.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $361.2M | $38.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $349.4M | $38.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $401.7M | $39.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $395.7M | $40.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $340.8M | $39.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $324.0M | $38.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-16.5M | $78.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-16.9M | $68.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -4.6% | 24.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 3.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -1.76× | 0.56× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-1.4M | $517.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-16.5M | $78.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7M | $194.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.7M | $98.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5M | $178.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.3M | $-205.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.6M | $274.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7M | $216.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.0M | $187.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-16.9M | $68.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4M | $185.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.7M | $91.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | $171.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-210.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.6M | $270.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $211.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.0M | $180.2M |
| Q4 25 | -4.6% | 24.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 67.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.7% | 34.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 64.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -78.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.1% | 103.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 81.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.4% | 75.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | -1.76× | 0.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.56× | 1.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.86× | 0.73× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.33× | 1.37× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.57× | -1.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | -29.31× | 2.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.85× | 1.94× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.70× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
