vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of American Electric Power (AEP) and Atmos Energy (ATO), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
American Electric Power is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.1B vs $1.3B, roughly 3.8× Atmos Energy). Atmos Energy runs the higher net margin — 12.0% vs 30.0%, a 18.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Atmos Energy posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.2% vs 6.2%). Over the past eight quarters, American Electric Power's revenue compounded faster (-0.3% CAGR vs -9.7%).
American Electric Power Company, Inc., an electric public utility holding company, engages in the generation, transmission, and distribution of electricity for sale to retail and wholesale customers in the United States. It operates through Vertically Integrated Utilities, Transmission and Distribution Utilities, AEP Transmission Holdco, and Generation & Marketing segments. The company generates electricity using coal and lignite, natural gas, nuclear, hydro, solar, wind, and other energy sou...
Atmos Energy Corporation, headquartered in Dallas, Texas, is one of the United States' largest natural-gas-only distributors, serving about three million natural gas distribution customers in over 1,400 communities in nine states from the Blue Ridge Mountains in the East to the Rocky Mountains in the West.
AEP vs ATO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q1 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.1B | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $605.2M | $403.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 22.1% | 38.3% |
| Net Margin | 12.0% | 30.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.2% | 14.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.1% | 14.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.06 | $2.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.0B | $737.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | $838.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5B | $657.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7B | $701.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.1B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $605.2M | $403.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $174.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $186.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $802.2M | $485.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $665.9M | $351.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $961.7M | $134.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $342.5M | $165.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $432.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 60.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 80.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 62.1% |
| Q4 25 | 22.1% | 38.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.5% | 29.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.7% | 30.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.8% | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.0% | 39.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.7% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.7% | 31.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.1% | 33.4% |
| Q4 25 | 12.0% | 30.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.8% | 23.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.5% | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | 24.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.0% | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.6% | 20.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 23.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.8% | 26.2% |
| Q4 25 | $1.06 | $2.44 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.81 | $1.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.29 | $1.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.50 | $3.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.24 | $2.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.80 | $0.82 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.64 | $1.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.90 | $2.85 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $417.0M | $367.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $47.3B | $9.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $31.1B | $14.3B |
| Total Assets | $114.5B | $29.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.52× | 0.67× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $417.0M | $367.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $202.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $439.3M | $709.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $463.6M | $543.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $418.3M | $584.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $474.4M | $307.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $428.2M | $674.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $447.7M | $262.5M |
| Q4 25 | $47.3B | $9.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.1B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.5B | $8.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.0B | $8.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.6B | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.0B | $7.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.1B | $7.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.8B | $7.4B |
| Q4 25 | $31.1B | $14.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.4B | $13.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.9B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.3B | $13.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.9B | $12.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.6B | $12.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.1B | $12.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.8B | $11.6B |
| Q4 25 | $114.5B | $29.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $110.3B | $28.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.8B | $27.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $104.4B | $27.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $103.1B | $26.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $100.1B | $25.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.6B | $24.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $97.7B | $24.0B |
| Q4 25 | 1.52× | 0.67× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.52× | 0.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.49× | 0.67× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.57× | 0.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.58× | 0.66× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.58× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.61× | 0.64× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.54× | 0.64× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.8B | $308.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-725.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -54.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | — | 77.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 3.00× | 0.76× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-1.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $308.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $348.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $496.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $922.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $282.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $330.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $411.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $746.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-725.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $-615.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-370.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $83.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-609.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-477.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-302.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $100.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | -54.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.3% | -83.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -44.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -51.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -72.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -43.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 77.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.0% | 130.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 103.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 75.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 122.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 101.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 39.2% |
| Q4 25 | 3.00× | 0.76× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.46× | 1.99× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.95× | 2.66× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.81× | 1.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.59× | 0.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.26× | 2.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.27× | 2.48× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.43× | 1.73× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AEP
| Transmissionand Distribution Utilities Revenues | $1.5B | 29% |
| Electric Generation Transmission Distribution Revenues | $956.6M | 19% |
| Electricity Transmission And Distribution Revenues | $931.8M | 18% |
| Industrial | $685.8M | 14% |
| Marketing Competitive Retailand Renewable | $438.3M | 9% |
| Wholesale Generation | $231.1M | 5% |
| Wholesale Transmission | $113.6M | 2% |
| Other | $110.2M | 2% |
| Electric Transmission | $103.4M | 2% |
| Other Retail | $60.1M | 1% |
ATO
| Distribution Segment | $1.3B | 94% |
| Transportation Revenue | $41.5M | 3% |
| Other | $39.4M | 3% |
| Miscellaneous Revenue | $2.8M | 0% |
