vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aeva Technologies, Inc. (AEVA) and Cellectis S.A. (CLLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cellectis S.A. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.5M vs $5.6M, roughly 1.7× Aeva Technologies, Inc.). Cellectis S.A. runs the higher net margin — -265.9% vs -450.3%, a 184.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cellectis S.A. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (375.0% vs 108.5%). Cellectis S.A. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($27.6M vs $-23.7M).
Aeva Technologies, Inc. is a publicly traded American corporation specializing in sensing hardware and perception software, including LiDAR, headquartered in Mountain View, California. Aeva makes sensing and perception tools for vehicular automation, metrology, and industrial automation.
Cellectis is a French biopharmaceutical company. It develops genome-edited chimeric antigen receptor T-cell technologies for cancer immunotherapy. It has offices in Paris, New York City, and Raleigh, North Carolina.
AEVA vs CLLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.6M | $9.5M |
| Net Profit | $-25.3M | $-25.3M |
| Gross Margin | 23.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -517.6% | -181.1% |
| Net Margin | -450.3% | -265.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 108.5% | 375.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.0% | -51.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.10 | $-0.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $5.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $9.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-25.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $107.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-192.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-34.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-36.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-37.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-43.4M | $-25.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-35.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -49.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -32.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -42.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -66.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -517.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -926.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -633.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -903.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1270.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1683.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2431.1% | -181.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1772.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -450.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3003.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3497.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1035.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1340.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1662.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2156.7% | -265.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1676.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.10 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.52 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.49 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.64 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.66 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.70 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.82 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.67 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $121.9M | $149.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $13.2M | $148.6M |
| Total Assets | $179.7M | $407.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $121.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $48.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $134.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $160.2M | $149.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $189.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $13.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-118.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $68.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $99.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $129.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $160.0M | $148.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $198.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $179.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $92.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $114.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $147.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $169.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $198.1M | $407.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $224.8M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-22.1M | $28.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-23.7M | $27.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -420.9% | 290.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 26.9% | 13.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-119.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-22.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-32.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-29.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-30.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-20.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-29.2M | $28.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-31.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-23.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-33.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-31.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-31.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-23.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-26.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-29.9M | $27.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-32.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | -420.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -938.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -566.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -927.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -854.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1174.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1488.3% | 290.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1547.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 26.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 79.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.7% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 78.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.30× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
