vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ABUNDIA GLOBAL IMPACT GROUP, INC. (AGIG) and CKX LANDS, INC. (CKX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ABUNDIA GLOBAL IMPACT GROUP, INC. runs the higher net margin — 22251.6% vs 71.5%, a 22180.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CKX LANDS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.8% vs -116.8%). Over the past eight quarters, CKX LANDS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (NaN% CAGR vs NaN%).
CKX Lands, Inc. is a U.S.-based land management and natural resources company. It owns and manages land parcels across North America, with core business segments including timber production, mineral rights leasing, agricultural land rental, and recreational land access services for individual and commercial customers.
AGIG vs CKX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $-27.9K | $232.6K |
| Net Profit | $-6.2M | $166.3K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 20546.5% | 48.7% |
| Net Margin | 22251.6% | 71.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -116.8% | 35.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -273.1% | 207.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.88 | $0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $-27.9K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $225.7K | $232.6K | ||
| Q2 25 | $110.6K | $135.9K | ||
| Q1 25 | $102.3K | $348.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $166.4K | $180.6K | ||
| Q3 24 | $130.2K | $171.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | $115.8K | $1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $147.7K | $141.8K |
| Q4 25 | $-6.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.4M | $166.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.8M | $161.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.0M | $115.6K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-281.8K | $54.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $396.7K | $565.3K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.1M | $-401.3K |
| Q4 25 | 20546.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -8915.6% | 48.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1648.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1037.7% | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4016.7% | -41.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -418.2% | -9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -354.3% | 62.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -276.3% | -307.8% |
| Q4 25 | 22251.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -9042.1% | 71.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1623.5% | 118.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1008.8% | 33.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1001.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -216.4% | 31.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 342.6% | 55.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1392.4% | -282.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.88 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.60 | $0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.11 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | $2027032.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.02 | $-1991337.18 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.01 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.08 | $0.27 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | $1991337.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.6M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $10.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $19.0M | $18.9M |
| Total Assets | $31.9M | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.54× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $525.8K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $19.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.3M | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.4M | $18.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $18.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.1M | $18.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.8M | $18.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.0M | $18.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.0M | $18.0M |
| Q4 25 | $31.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.8M | $19.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.7M | $18.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2M | $19.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $18.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2M | $18.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.4M | $19.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.5M | $18.4M |
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.4M | $242.3K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-3.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.8M | $242.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5M | $-24.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $118.7K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-552.1K | $97.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.5M | $-246.5K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-35.0K | $691.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $122.8K | $-337.8K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.09× | 1.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
