vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FEDERAL AGRICULTURAL MORTGAGE CORP (AGM) and AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FEDERAL AGRICULTURAL MORTGAGE CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($107.5M vs $104.4M, roughly 1.0× AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP). On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs 6.1%). Over the past eight quarters, FEDERAL AGRICULTURAL MORTGAGE CORP's revenue compounded faster (7.1% CAGR vs -2.6%).
The Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation, also known as Farmer Mac, is a stockholder-owned, federally chartered corporation established by the U.S. Congress in 1988 under the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987. It was created to establish a secondary market for agricultural real estate and housing mortgage loans, to increase liquidity and the availability of long-term, stable credit for farmers, ranchers, and rural communities.
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
AGM vs AP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $107.5M | $104.4M |
| Net Profit | — | $-57.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 56.3% | -54.0% |
| Net Margin | — | -55.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.1% | 11.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -1958.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.69 | $-2.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $107.5M | $104.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $104.0M | $103.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $102.6M | $108.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $94.3M | $99.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.3M | $93.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $90.3M | $92.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.9M | $107.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $93.7M | $110.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-57.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.0M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.8M | $-7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.7M | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.5M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.8M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.1M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $53.7M | $-2.7M |
| Q4 25 | 56.3% | -54.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 64.1% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 63.8% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 66.9% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 67.5% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 69.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 65.9% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 72.8% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -55.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 52.9% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.4% | -6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 52.6% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.8% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.2% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 57.4% | -2.5% |
| Q4 25 | $3.69 | $-2.87 | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.44 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.48 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.01 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.62 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.86 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.68 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.28 | $-0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $10.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $30.8B | $117.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.7B | $32.6M |
| Total Assets | $35.4B | $495.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 17.93× | 3.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $10.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $842.1M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $923.0M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $745.1M | $10.8M |
| Q4 25 | $30.8B | $117.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.2B | $119.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.9B | $115.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.0B | $115.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.5B | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.2B | $116.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.8B | $119.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.8B | $116.2M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $32.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $60.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $62.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $64.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $58.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $56.3M |
| Q4 25 | $35.4B | $495.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.4B | $524.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.0B | $537.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.8B | $536.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.3B | $530.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.6B | $547.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.2B | $560.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.8B | $565.8M |
| Q4 25 | 17.93× | 3.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.31× | 1.98× | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.70× | 1.85× | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.39× | 1.78× | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.48× | 1.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.60× | 1.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.87× | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.11× | 2.06× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $80.1M | $2.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-64.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -0.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 2.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-8.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $80.1M | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.2M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-47.7M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-49.8M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $612.6M | $7.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-44.4M | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.1M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $233.3M | $4.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-64.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-7.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $607.4M | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-44.4M | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.6M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $231.7M | $1.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 599.8% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -49.2% | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 58.5% | -7.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 247.3% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 2.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.87× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.00× | -4.62× | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.84× | 2.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.19× | -2.64× | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.34× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AGM
Segment breakdown not available.
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
