vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. (AHH) and AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $75.6M, roughly 1.4× Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc.). Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.1% vs -55.2%, a 58.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs 0.8%). Over the past eight quarters, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP's revenue compounded faster (-2.6% CAGR vs -22.8%).
Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. is a publicly traded U.S. real estate investment trust operating across the Mid-Atlantic and Southeast regions. It develops, owns, and manages a diversified portfolio of office, retail, and multifamily residential properties, and also offers construction and development services for third-party clients.
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
AHH vs AP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $75.6M | $104.4M |
| Net Profit | $2.4M | $-57.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 31.0% | -54.0% |
| Net Margin | 3.1% | -55.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.8% | 11.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -89.8% | -1958.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | $-2.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $75.6M | $104.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.7M | $103.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $69.1M | $108.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $67.8M | $99.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.0M | $93.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $114.4M | $92.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.8M | $107.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $127.0M | $110.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $-57.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.0K | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9M | $-7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.8M | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.4M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.0M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.1M | $-2.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 37.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 31.0% | -54.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.6% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.2% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 50.1% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.9% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.1% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | 3.1% | -55.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.6% | -6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.1% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.4% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.1% | -2.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | $-2.87 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.04 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.28 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.11 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.17 | $-0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $49.1M | $10.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.5B | $117.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $627.8M | $32.6M |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $495.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.43× | 3.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $49.1M | $10.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.5M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.1M | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.7M | $7.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.9M | $15.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.9M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.3M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $41.9M | $10.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $117.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $119.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $115.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $115.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $116.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $119.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $116.2M |
| Q4 25 | $627.8M | $32.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $638.8M | $60.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $652.0M | $62.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $657.4M | $64.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $670.6M | $58.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $663.9M | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $562.7M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $571.4M | $56.3M |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $495.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $524.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $537.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $536.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $530.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $547.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | $560.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $565.8M |
| Q4 25 | 2.43× | 3.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.33× | 1.98× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.22× | 1.85× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.01× | 1.78× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.93× | 1.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.00× | 1.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.52× | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.50× | 2.06× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $64.2M | $2.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-64.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -0.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 26.99× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-8.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $64.2M | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.3M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.1M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $107.0K | $-5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.0M | $7.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.3M | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.4M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $46.5M | $4.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-64.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-7.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -7.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.6% |
| Q4 25 | 26.99× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 328.63× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.62× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.78× | 2.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.48× | -2.64× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.30× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AHH
| Office Real Estate Segment | $28.8M | 38% |
| Retail Real Estate Segment | $25.4M | 34% |
| Multifamily Residential Real Estate | $17.7M | 23% |
| Real Estate Financing Segment | $3.6M | 5% |
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
