vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. (AHH) and PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. (PBYI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($75.6M vs $75.5M, roughly 1.0× PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC.). On growth, PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (27.7% vs 0.8%). Over the past eight quarters, PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (31.3% CAGR vs -22.8%).
Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. is a publicly traded U.S. real estate investment trust operating across the Mid-Atlantic and Southeast regions. It develops, owns, and manages a diversified portfolio of office, retail, and multifamily residential properties, and also offers construction and development services for third-party clients.
Puma Biotechnology is a publicly traded biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Los Angeles, CA.
AHH vs PBYI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $75.6M | $75.5M |
| Net Profit | $2.4M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 69.3% |
| Operating Margin | 31.0% | 22.7% |
| Net Margin | 3.1% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 0.8% | 27.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -89.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | $0.26 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $75.6M | $75.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.7M | $54.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $69.1M | $52.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $67.8M | $46.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.0M | $59.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $114.4M | $80.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.8M | $47.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $127.0M | $43.8M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.0K | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9M | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.8M | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.0M | $20.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.1M | $-4.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 69.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 77.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 76.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 77.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 76.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.0% | 63.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.8% | 77.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 37.9% | 75.5% |
| Q4 25 | 31.0% | 22.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.2% | 17.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.6% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.2% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 50.1% | 22.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.9% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.1% | -5.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 16.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.6% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.1% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.4% | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.1% | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.04 | $0.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.28 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.11 | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.17 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $49.1M | $97.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.5B | $22.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $627.8M | $130.3M |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $216.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.43× | 0.17× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $49.1M | $97.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.5M | $94.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.1M | $96.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.7M | $93.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.9M | $101.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.9M | $96.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.3M | $96.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $41.9M | $107.2M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $22.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $45.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $56.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $68.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $79.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $90.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $102.0M |
| Q4 25 | $627.8M | $130.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $638.8M | $115.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $652.0M | $104.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $657.4M | $97.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $670.6M | $92.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $663.9M | $71.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $562.7M | $48.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $571.4M | $51.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $216.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $202.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $194.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $196.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $213.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $220.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | $205.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $214.1M |
| Q4 25 | 2.43× | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.33× | 0.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.22× | 0.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.01× | 0.58× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.93× | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.00× | 1.12× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.52× | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.50× | 2.00× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $64.2M | $14.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $14.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 19.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 26.99× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $41.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $64.2M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.3M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.1M | $14.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $107.0K | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.0M | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.3M | $11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.4M | $1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $46.5M | $11.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $14.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 26.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 26.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | 26.99× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 328.63× | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.87× | 2.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.78× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.48× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.30× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AHH
| Office Real Estate Segment | $28.8M | 38% |
| Retail Real Estate Segment | $25.4M | 34% |
| Multifamily Residential Real Estate | $17.7M | 23% |
| Real Estate Financing Segment | $3.6M | 5% |
PBYI
Segment breakdown not available.
