vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of American Healthcare REIT, Inc. (AHR) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Monolithic Power Systems is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($751.2M vs $564.0M, roughly 1.3× American Healthcare REIT, Inc.). Monolithic Power Systems runs the higher net margin — 22.9% vs 1.9%, a 20.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Monolithic Power Systems posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.8% vs 13.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Monolithic Power Systems's revenue compounded faster (28.1% CAGR vs 11.7%).
Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (MPT) is an international real estate investment trust (REIT) based in Birmingham, Alabama that purchases and invests in healthcare facilities and for-profit healthcare holding companies, primarily in the United States and Europe. Their property acquisitions often come in the form of sale-leaseback agreements, in which the original property owner sells the property to MPT and becomes their tenant. MPT's tenants are generally subject to long-term triple net lease...
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. is an American, publicly traded company headquartered in Kirkland, Washington. It operates in more than 15 locations worldwide.
AHR vs MPWR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $564.0M | $751.2M |
| Net Profit | $10.8M | $171.7M |
| Gross Margin | 14.8% | 55.2% |
| Operating Margin | 19.8% | 26.6% |
| Net Margin | 1.9% | 22.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.5% | 20.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 133.9% | -86.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | $3.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $564.0M | $751.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $532.1M | $737.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $501.3M | $664.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $497.2M | $637.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $496.8M | $621.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $476.8M | $620.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $458.0M | $507.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $452.1M | $457.9M |
| Q4 25 | $10.8M | $171.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.9M | $179.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $135.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.8M | $135.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-31.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.1M | $144.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $100.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.9M | $92.5M |
| Q4 25 | 14.8% | 55.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.6% | 55.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.0% | 55.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.0% | 55.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.3% | 55.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.5% | 55.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.1% | 55.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.7% | 55.1% |
| Q4 25 | 19.8% | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.9% | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.6% | 24.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.0% | 26.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.0% | 26.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.6% | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 23.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.2% | 20.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 22.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.5% | 24.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.4% | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.4% | 201.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.9% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 19.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.9% | 20.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.07 | $3.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.33 | $3.74 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.06 | $2.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.04 | $2.81 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.23 | $25.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.03 | $2.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $2.05 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.04 | $1.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $114.8M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.3B | $3.5B |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $4.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $114.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $147.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.1M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $76.7M | $862.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.0M | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $3.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.7B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.7B | $2.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $55.2M | $104.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $63.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 8.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.12× | 0.61× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $666.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $55.2M | $104.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $107.2M | $239.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.5M | $237.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.6M | $256.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $59.5M | $167.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.1M | $231.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.4M | $141.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.0M | $248.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $63.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $196.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $189.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $216.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $102.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $197.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $109.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $232.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 26.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 28.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 31.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 50.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | 5.12× | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.92× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.21× | 1.76× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.60× | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.02× | 1.40× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AHR
| Integrated Senior Health Campuses | $467.0M | 83% |
| SHOP | $97.0M | 17% |
MPWR
Segment breakdown not available.
