vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of American Healthcare REIT, Inc. (AHR) and OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC (OII). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($692.4M vs $564.0M, roughly 1.2× American Healthcare REIT, Inc.). OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC runs the higher net margin — 5.2% vs 1.9%, a 3.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, American Healthcare REIT, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.5% vs 3.6%). Over the past eight quarters, American Healthcare REIT, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.7% CAGR vs 1.8%).
Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (MPT) is an international real estate investment trust (REIT) based in Birmingham, Alabama that purchases and invests in healthcare facilities and for-profit healthcare holding companies, primarily in the United States and Europe. Their property acquisitions often come in the form of sale-leaseback agreements, in which the original property owner sells the property to MPT and becomes their tenant. MPT's tenants are generally subject to long-term triple net lease...
Oceaneering International, Inc. is a subsea engineering and applied technology company based in Houston, Texas, U.S. that provides engineered services and hardware to customers who operate in marine, space, and other environments.
AHR vs OII — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $564.0M | $692.4M |
| Net Profit | $10.8M | $36.1M |
| Gross Margin | 14.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 19.8% | — |
| Net Margin | 1.9% | 5.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.5% | 3.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 133.9% | -28.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | $0.36 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $692.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $564.0M | $668.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $532.1M | $742.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $501.3M | $698.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $497.2M | $674.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $496.8M | $713.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $476.8M | $679.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $458.0M | $668.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $36.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.8M | $177.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.9M | $71.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $54.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.8M | $50.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-31.8M | $56.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.1M | $41.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $35.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.8% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.6% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.0% | 21.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.0% | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.3% | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.5% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.1% | 18.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.8% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.9% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.6% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.0% | 10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.0% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.6% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 9.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.5% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.4% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.4% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.9% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 5.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.07 | $1.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.33 | $0.71 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.06 | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.04 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.23 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.03 | $0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $0.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $114.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $488.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.3B | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $2.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.44× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $114.8M | $695.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $147.4M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.5M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.1M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $76.7M | $504.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $488.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $487.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $482.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $907.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $842.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $773.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $714.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $698.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $651.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.6B | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $55.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-76.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -11.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.12× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $238.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $55.2M | $221.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $107.2M | $101.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.5M | $77.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.6M | $-80.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $59.5M | $128.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.1M | $91.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.4M | $52.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-76.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $190.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $77.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $46.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-106.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $94.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $67.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | -11.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 28.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.12× | 1.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.92× | 1.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.21× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.02× | 1.50× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AHR
| Integrated Senior Health Campuses | $467.0M | 83% |
| SHOP | $97.0M | 17% |
OII
Segment breakdown not available.
