vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST INC (AHT) and Fat Brands, Inc (FAT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($259.0M vs $140.0M, roughly 1.8× Fat Brands, Inc). ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST INC runs the higher net margin — -26.8% vs -41.6%, a 14.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fat Brands, Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.3% vs -6.0%). Fat Brands, Inc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-16.9M vs $-86.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Fat Brands, Inc's revenue compounded faster (-6.1% CAGR vs -7.7%).

Ashford Hospitality Trust Inc is a U.S.-headquartered real estate investment trust focused on upper-upscale full-service hotel properties across key U.S. urban, suburban and resort markets. Its portfolio holds assets under top global hospitality brands, serving business and leisure travelers, with a focus on long-term value growth and stable shareholder returns.

FAT Brands Inc. is an American multi-brand restaurant and sports bar franchise operator headquartered in Beverly Hills, California.

AHT vs FAT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
AHT
AHT
1.8× larger
AHT
$259.0M
$140.0M
FAT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
FAT
FAT
+3.7% gap
FAT
-2.3%
-6.0%
AHT
Higher net margin
AHT
AHT
14.8% more per $
AHT
-26.8%
-41.6%
FAT
More free cash flow
FAT
FAT
$69.9M more FCF
FAT
$-16.9M
$-86.8M
AHT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
FAT
FAT
Annualised
FAT
-6.1%
-7.7%
AHT

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025

Metric
AHT
AHT
FAT
FAT
Revenue
$259.0M
$140.0M
Net Profit
$-69.3M
$-58.2M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
-2.6%
-12.4%
Net Margin
-26.8%
-41.6%
Revenue YoY
-6.0%
-2.3%
Net Profit YoY
44.2%
-30.1%
EPS (diluted)
$-12.85
$-3.39

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
AHT
AHT
FAT
FAT
Q4 25
$259.0M
Q3 25
$266.1M
$140.0M
Q2 25
$302.0M
$146.8M
Q1 25
$277.4M
$142.0M
Q4 24
$275.5M
$145.3M
Q3 24
$276.6M
$143.4M
Q2 24
$316.5M
$152.0M
Q1 24
$303.9M
$152.0M
Net Profit
AHT
AHT
FAT
FAT
Q4 25
$-69.3M
Q3 25
$-60.1M
$-58.2M
Q2 25
$-30.4M
$-54.2M
Q1 25
$-20.0M
$-46.0M
Q4 24
$-124.2M
$-67.4M
Q3 24
$-57.9M
$-44.8M
Q2 24
$50.3M
$-39.4M
Q1 24
$71.6M
$-38.3M
Operating Margin
AHT
AHT
FAT
FAT
Q4 25
-2.6%
Q3 25
4.6%
-12.4%
Q2 25
16.3%
-10.6%
Q1 25
22.2%
-6.0%
Q4 24
-17.8%
-27.1%
Q3 24
7.3%
-6.2%
Q2 24
42.8%
-1.8%
Q1 24
50.2%
-0.9%
Net Margin
AHT
AHT
FAT
FAT
Q4 25
-26.8%
Q3 25
-22.6%
-41.6%
Q2 25
-10.1%
-36.9%
Q1 25
-7.2%
-32.4%
Q4 24
-45.1%
-46.4%
Q3 24
-20.9%
-31.2%
Q2 24
15.9%
-25.9%
Q1 24
23.5%
-25.2%
EPS (diluted)
AHT
AHT
FAT
FAT
Q4 25
$-12.85
Q3 25
$-11.35
$-3.39
Q2 25
$-6.88
$-3.17
Q1 25
$-4.91
$-2.73
Q4 24
$-13.64
$-4.06
Q3 24
$-12.39
$-2.74
Q2 24
$2.50
$-2.43
Q1 24
$5.99
$-2.37

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
AHT
AHT
FAT
FAT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$66.1M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$2.5B
$1.3B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$-626.4M
$-585.8M
Total Assets
$2.8B
$1.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
AHT
AHT
FAT
FAT
Q4 25
$66.1M
Q3 25
$81.9M
Q2 25
$100.0M
Q1 25
$85.8M
Q4 24
$112.9M
Q3 24
$119.7M
Q2 24
$121.8M
Q1 24
$111.1M
Total Debt
AHT
AHT
FAT
FAT
Q4 25
$2.5B
Q3 25
$2.6B
$1.3B
Q2 25
$2.6B
$1.3B
Q1 25
$2.7B
$1.3B
Q4 24
$2.6B
$1.3B
Q3 24
$2.7B
$1.2B
Q2 24
$2.8B
$1.2B
Q1 24
$2.9B
$1.2B
Stockholders' Equity
AHT
AHT
FAT
FAT
Q4 25
$-626.4M
Q3 25
$-548.7M
$-585.8M
Q2 25
$-485.5M
$-536.5M
Q1 25
$-446.1M
$-493.9M
Q4 24
$-419.2M
$-455.7M
Q3 24
$-288.4M
$-386.1M
Q2 24
$-225.9M
$-338.6M
Q1 24
$-276.8M
$-296.8M
Total Assets
AHT
AHT
FAT
FAT
Q4 25
$2.8B
Q3 25
$3.0B
$1.2B
Q2 25
$3.1B
$1.2B
Q1 25
$3.1B
$1.3B
Q4 24
$3.2B
$1.3B
Q3 24
$3.3B
$1.3B
Q2 24
$3.3B
$1.4B
Q1 24
$3.5B
$1.4B

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
AHT
AHT
FAT
FAT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-15.7M
$-14.5M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-86.8M
$-16.9M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-33.5%
-12.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
27.5%
1.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-135.5M
$-75.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
AHT
AHT
FAT
FAT
Q4 25
$-15.7M
Q3 25
$5.5M
$-14.5M
Q2 25
$16.3M
$-26.9M
Q1 25
$-25.0M
$-13.2M
Q4 24
$-23.6M
$-10.4M
Q3 24
$795.0K
$-3.2M
Q2 24
$8.0M
$-14.2M
Q1 24
$-46.5M
$-28.4M
Free Cash Flow
AHT
AHT
FAT
FAT
Q4 25
$-86.8M
Q3 25
$-226.0K
$-16.9M
Q2 25
$-3.6M
$-29.3M
Q1 25
$-44.8M
$-17.8M
Q4 24
$-131.6M
$-11.0M
Q3 24
$-21.8M
$-11.1M
Q2 24
$-22.9M
$-24.4M
Q1 24
$-80.4M
$-32.5M
FCF Margin
AHT
AHT
FAT
FAT
Q4 25
-33.5%
Q3 25
-0.1%
-12.1%
Q2 25
-1.2%
-20.0%
Q1 25
-16.2%
-12.5%
Q4 24
-47.8%
-7.6%
Q3 24
-7.9%
-7.7%
Q2 24
-7.2%
-16.1%
Q1 24
-26.5%
-21.4%
Capex Intensity
AHT
AHT
FAT
FAT
Q4 25
27.5%
Q3 25
2.1%
1.7%
Q2 25
6.6%
1.6%
Q1 25
7.2%
3.2%
Q4 24
39.2%
0.4%
Q3 24
8.2%
5.5%
Q2 24
9.8%
6.7%
Q1 24
11.2%
2.7%
Cash Conversion
AHT
AHT
FAT
FAT
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
0.16×
Q1 24
-0.65×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

AHT
AHT

Occupancy$190.2M73%
Food And Beverage$51.8M20%
Hotel Other$16.6M6%

FAT
FAT

Restaurant Sales$96.6M69%
Royalty$21.6M15%
Factory$9.6M7%
Advertising$9.1M7%
Franchisor$1.5M1%
Other$1.5M1%

Related Comparisons