vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of C3.ai, Inc. (AI) and AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $75.1M, roughly 1.4× C3.ai, Inc.). AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP runs the higher net margin — -55.2% vs -139.3%, a 84.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs -20.3%). AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-64.0K vs $-46.9M). Over the past eight quarters, C3.ai, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-2.1% CAGR vs -2.6%).
C3.ai, Inc. is a leading enterprise artificial intelligence software provider that develops and delivers scalable AI applications, platform tools, and industry-specific solutions for clients across sectors including manufacturing, energy, financial services, healthcare and public sector. Its offerings help organizations optimize operations, reduce costs, mitigate risks, and realize data-driven decision making.
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
AI vs AP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $75.1M | $104.4M |
| Net Profit | $-104.7M | $-57.7M |
| Gross Margin | 40.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -149.2% | -54.0% |
| Net Margin | -139.3% | -55.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -20.3% | 11.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -58.7% | -1958.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.75 | $-2.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $75.1M | $104.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $70.3M | $103.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.7M | $108.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $98.8M | $99.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.3M | $93.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.2M | $92.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $86.6M | $107.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $78.4M | $110.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-104.7M | $-57.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-116.8M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-79.7M | $-7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-80.2M | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-66.0M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.8M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-72.9M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-72.6M | $-2.7M |
| Q4 25 | 40.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 59.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 57.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -149.2% | -54.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -177.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -81.8% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -88.7% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -79.8% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -83.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -95.1% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -105.3% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | -139.3% | -55.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -166.2% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -73.3% | -6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -81.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -69.9% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -72.0% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -84.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -92.6% | -2.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.75 | $-2.87 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.86 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.60 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.62 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.52 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.50 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.59 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.60 | $-0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $675.0M | $10.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $117.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $771.9M | $32.6M |
| Total Assets | $961.3M | $495.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $675.0M | $10.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $711.9M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $742.7M | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $724.3M | $7.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $730.4M | $15.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $762.5M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $750.4M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $723.3M | $10.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $117.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $119.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $115.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $115.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $116.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $119.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $116.2M |
| Q4 25 | $771.9M | $32.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $798.8M | $60.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $838.3M | $62.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $860.2M | $64.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $859.0M | $58.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $874.9M | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $873.4M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $898.0M | $56.3M |
| Q4 25 | $961.3M | $495.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $968.7M | $524.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $537.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $536.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $530.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $547.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $560.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $565.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.98× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.78× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.06× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-46.5M | $2.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-46.9M | $-64.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -62.4% | -0.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 2.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-93.2M | $-8.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-46.5M | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-33.5M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.3M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.0M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-38.7M | $7.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.0M | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.3M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-39.1M | $4.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-46.9M | $-64.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-34.3M | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.3M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.4M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-39.5M | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.1M | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.8M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-45.1M | $1.7M |
| Q4 25 | -62.4% | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -48.8% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.5% | -3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -22.7% | -7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -41.9% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.2% | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.7% | -7.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -57.6% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.8% | 2.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.62× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2.64× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AI
| License And Service | $70.2M | 93% |
| Professional Services | $4.9M | 7% |
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
