vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of C3.ai, Inc. (AI) and BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST (BDN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($127.0M vs $75.1M, roughly 1.7× C3.ai, Inc.). BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST runs the higher net margin — -38.4% vs -139.3%, a 100.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.5% vs -20.3%). Over the past eight quarters, BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST's revenue compounded faster (0.7% CAGR vs -2.1%).
C3.ai, Inc. is a leading enterprise artificial intelligence software provider that develops and delivers scalable AI applications, platform tools, and industry-specific solutions for clients across sectors including manufacturing, energy, financial services, healthcare and public sector. Its offerings help organizations optimize operations, reduce costs, mitigate risks, and realize data-driven decision making.
Brandywine Realty Trust is a Philadelphia-based real estate investment trust (REIT) that invests in office buildings in Philadelphia, Washington, D.C., and Austin, Texas.
AI vs BDN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $75.1M | $127.0M |
| Net Profit | $-104.7M | $-48.8M |
| Gross Margin | 40.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -149.2% | 1.2% |
| Net Margin | -139.3% | -38.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -20.3% | 4.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -58.7% | -80.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.75 | $-0.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $127.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $75.1M | $121.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $70.3M | $121.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.7M | $120.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $98.8M | $121.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.3M | $121.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.2M | $131.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $86.6M | $125.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-48.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-104.7M | $-36.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-116.8M | $-25.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-79.7M | $-88.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-80.2M | $-27.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-66.0M | $-44.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.8M | $-165.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-72.9M | $30.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 40.4% | 61.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.6% | 62.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.1% | 62.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 59.1% | 60.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.3% | 61.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.8% | 64.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.6% | 63.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -149.2% | 22.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -177.7% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -81.8% | -34.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -88.7% | 12.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -79.8% | 18.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -83.2% | -7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -95.1% | 15.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | -38.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | -139.3% | -30.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -166.2% | -21.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -73.3% | -73.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -81.2% | -22.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -69.9% | -36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -72.0% | -125.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -84.2% | 24.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.28 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.75 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.86 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.60 | $-0.51 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.62 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.52 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.50 | $-0.96 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.59 | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $675.0M | $36.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $771.9M | — |
| Total Assets | $961.3M | $3.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $36.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $675.0M | $32.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $711.9M | $75.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $742.7M | $122.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $724.3M | $29.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $730.4M | $90.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $762.5M | $36.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $750.4M | $30.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $771.9M | $792.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $798.8M | $841.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $838.3M | $879.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $860.2M | $993.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $859.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $874.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $873.4M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $961.3M | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $968.7M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $3.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.23× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.23× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.73× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-46.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-46.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -62.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-93.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-46.5M | $116.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-33.5M | $47.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.3M | $34.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.0M | $6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-38.7M | $181.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.0M | $52.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.3M | $48.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-46.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-34.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-39.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -62.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -48.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -22.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -41.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.60× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AI
| License And Service | $70.2M | 93% |
| Professional Services | $4.9M | 7% |
BDN
| Rents | $120.7M | 95% |
| Third party management fees, labor reimbursement and leasing | $4.7M | 4% |
