vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of American International Group (AIG) and GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO (GT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
American International Group is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.5B vs $4.9B, roughly 1.3× GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO). American International Group runs the higher net margin — 11.2% vs 2.1%, a 9.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, American International Group posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (380.9% vs -0.6%). Over the past eight quarters, GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO's revenue compounded faster (4.1% CAGR vs -18.4%).
American International Group, Inc. offers insurance products for commercial, institutional, and individual customers in North America and internationally. The company's General Insurance segment provides general liability, environmental, commercial automobile liability, workers' compensation, casualty, and crisis management insurance products; commercial, industrial, and energy-related property insurance; and aerospace, political risk, trade credit, portfolio solutions, crop, and marine insur...
Cooper Tire & Rubber Company is an American company that specializes in the design, manufacture, marketing, and sales of replacement automobile and truck tires, and has subsidiaries that specialize in medium truck, motorcycle, and racing tires. With headquarters in Findlay, Ohio, Cooper Tire has 60 manufacturing, sales, distribution, technical, and design facilities within its worldwide family of subsidiary companies, including the UK-based Avon Tyres brand, which produces tires for motorcycl...
AIG vs GT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.5B | $4.9B |
| Net Profit | $735.0M | $105.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 20.9% |
| Operating Margin | 10.1% | 3.3% |
| Net Margin | 11.2% | 2.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 380.9% | -0.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -18.2% | 43.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.36 | $0.36 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.6B | $4.5B |
| Q4 25 | $735.0M | $105.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $519.0M | $-2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $254.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $698.0M | $115.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $73.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $459.0M | $-37.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.0B | $79.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $-69.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 18.0% |
| Q4 25 | 10.1% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.2% | -15.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.8% | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | -0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.3% | -1.1% |
| Q4 25 | 11.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | -47.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.1% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.3% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | -0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -60.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.7% | -1.5% |
| Q4 25 | $1.36 | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.93 | $-7.62 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.98 | $0.87 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.16 | $0.40 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.71 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.96 | $0.28 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.74 | $-0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $801.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $9.2B | $5.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $41.1B | $3.2B |
| Total Assets | $161.3B | $18.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.22× | 1.65× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $801.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $810.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $785.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $902.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $810.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $905.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $789.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $893.0M |
| Q4 25 | $9.2B | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.5B |
| Q4 25 | $41.1B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.1B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.5B | $5.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.4B | $4.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.0B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.4B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.4B | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | $161.3B | $18.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $163.4B | $20.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $166.0B | $22.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $161.9B | $21.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $20.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $169.4B | $22.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $167.9B | $22.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $544.1B | $22.0B |
| Q4 25 | 0.22× | 1.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.57× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.45× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.61× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $636.0M | $1.5B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.3B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 27.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.87× | 14.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-30.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $636.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $-180.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-56.0M | $-538.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $-73.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $930.0M | $-67.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $519.0M | $-451.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-181.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-387.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-797.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-351.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-383.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-769.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -16.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.87× | 14.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.59× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.22× | -0.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.08× | -4.68× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 17.66× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.70× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.85× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.43× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIG
Segment breakdown not available.
GT
| Tire Unit Sales | $2.4B | 50% |
| Other | $2.3B | 46% |
| Other Tireand Related Sales | $192.0M | 4% |
