vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of American International Group (AIG) and MESABI TRUST (MSB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
American International Group is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.5B vs $3.6M, roughly 1824.3× MESABI TRUST). MESABI TRUST runs the higher net margin — 77.1% vs 11.2%, a 65.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, American International Group posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (380.9% vs -95.5%). Over the past eight quarters, MESABI TRUST's revenue compounded faster (-24.1% CAGR vs -27.8%).
American International Group, Inc. offers insurance products for commercial, institutional, and individual customers in North America and internationally. The company's General Insurance segment provides general liability, environmental, commercial automobile liability, workers' compensation, casualty, and crisis management insurance products; commercial, industrial, and energy-related property insurance; and aerospace, political risk, trade credit, portfolio solutions, crop, and marine insur...
Mesabi Trust is a United States-based royalty trust that holds permanent royalty interests in iron ore mining properties located in Minnesota's Mesabi Range. It earns revenue primarily from royalty payments tied to the production and sale of iron ore products, with core earnings sourced from active mining partners operating on the land it holds interests in, catering to the global steel manufacturing market.
AIG vs MSB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q3 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.5B | $3.6M |
| Net Profit | $735.0M | $2.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 77.1% |
| Operating Margin | 10.1% | — |
| Net Margin | 11.2% | 77.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 380.9% | -95.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -18.2% | -96.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.36 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $3.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $5.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | $6.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $79.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8B | $6.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6B | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.6B | $6.2M |
| Q4 25 | $735.0M | $2.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $519.0M | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $698.0M | $6.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $898.0M | $78.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $459.0M | $5.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.0B | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $4.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 77.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 84.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 76.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 88.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 99.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 83.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 55.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 75.3% |
| Q4 25 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 11.2% | 77.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | 84.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.1% | 76.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.3% | 88.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 65.9% | 99.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | 83.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -60.6% | 55.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.7% | 75.3% |
| Q4 25 | $1.36 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.93 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.98 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.16 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.34 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.71 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.96 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.74 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $9.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $41.1B | $21.1M |
| Total Assets | $161.3B | $26.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.22× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $9.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $41.1B | $21.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.1B | $22.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.5B | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.4B | $23.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.5B | $95.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.0B | $22.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.4B | $20.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.4B | $21.0M |
| Q4 25 | $161.3B | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $163.4B | $24.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $166.0B | $27.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $161.9B | $101.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.3B | $100.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $169.4B | $26.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $167.9B | $25.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $544.1B | $26.7M |
| Q4 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $636.0M | $3.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.87× | 1.27× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $636.0M | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $4.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $2.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-56.0M | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $125.0M | $78.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $930.0M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $519.0M | $5.7M |
| Q4 25 | 0.87× | 1.27× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.59× | 0.92× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.22× | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.08× | 1.55× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.14× | 1.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.70× | 0.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.72× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.43× | 1.21× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
