vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Senmiao Technology Ltd (AIHS) and LQR House Inc. (YHC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Senmiao Technology Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($358.7K vs $299.7K, roughly 1.2× LQR House Inc.). Senmiao Technology Ltd runs the higher net margin — -289.2% vs -1368.7%, a 1079.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Senmiao Technology Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-60.9% vs -64.2%).
Senmiao Technology Ltd is a China-based automotive service provider that operates online used car trading platforms, offers auto financing referral services, and matches after-sales support for individual consumers and small auto dealers across domestic regional markets. Its core segments include transaction facilitation, financing consulting, and other value-added services for the domestic automotive circulation sector.
LQR House Inc. is a US-based alcohol beverage e-commerce and distribution company. It offers a broad portfolio of spirits, wine, and beer, operating two core segments: direct-to-consumer retail for individuals and wholesale distribution for business clients across the United States.
AIHS vs YHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $358.7K | $299.7K |
| Net Profit | $-1.0M | $-4.1M |
| Gross Margin | 13.8% | 17.8% |
| Operating Margin | -305.7% | -1000.3% |
| Net Margin | -289.2% | -1368.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -60.9% | -64.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -83.5% | 72.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.29 | $2.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $358.7K | $299.7K | ||
| Q3 25 | $906.5K | $337.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | $836.0K | $498.5K | ||
| Q1 25 | $809.6K | $429.3K | ||
| Q4 24 | $917.0K | $838.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $742.3K | $624.5K | ||
| Q2 24 | $873.8K | $557.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-71.5K | $481.1K |
| Q4 25 | $-1.0M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-648.7K | $-16.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-164.4K | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-565.3K | $-14.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-711.4K | $-3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-673.4K | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.4M | $-2.4M |
| Q4 25 | 13.8% | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.6% | 17.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.7% | 7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.6% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.1% | -9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.0% | -27.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 176.1% | -16.5% |
| Q4 25 | -305.7% | -1000.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -83.6% | -1134.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -73.1% | -442.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -255.3% | -559.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -44.8% | -1221.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -83.0% | -561.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -88.6% | -407.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2115.7% | -513.9% |
| Q4 25 | -289.2% | -1368.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -71.6% | -4989.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -19.7% | -441.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -219.3% | -556.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -61.7% | -1760.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -95.8% | -538.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -77.1% | -396.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1932.0% | -504.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.29 | $2.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.43 | $-1.50 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.15 | $-1.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.51 | $-3.85 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.54 | $-88.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.68 | $-21.84 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.64 | $-15.49 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $-18.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.5M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $397.3K | $29.3M |
| Total Assets | $5.7M | $31.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $677.0K | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $867.8K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $701.3K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $949.2K | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $792.0K | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $748.9K | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $737.7K | $4.0M |
| Q4 25 | $397.3K | $29.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.1M | $27.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.6M | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.9M | $7.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.2M | $-518.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-459.2K | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $159.2K | $11.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $894.9K | $12.4M |
| Q4 25 | $5.7M | $31.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $35.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.8M | $9.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.9M | $6.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6M | $9.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.2M | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | $12.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-865.6K | $-14.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-865.6K | $-14.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-71.4K | $-11.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-321.2K | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-48.1K | $-6.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $356.1K | $-3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $175.6K | $-1.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.8K | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-247.5K | $-1.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-49.3K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $355.3K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $175.6K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.6K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-275.8K | $-1.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 385.8% | -287.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -39.6% | 2.1% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
