vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ROBO.AI INC. (AIIO) and Aeluma, Inc. (ALMU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Aeluma, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3M vs $864.0K, roughly 1.5× ROBO.AI INC.). Aeluma, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -145.7% vs -258.8%, a 113.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Aeluma, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered technology firm focused on the design, development, and production of high-performance optoelectronic components and semiconductor products. Its core offerings include photonic sensors and laser diodes, serving the LiDAR, 5G/6G communication, industrial sensing, and automotive markets across North America and the Asia-Pacific region.
AIIO vs ALMU — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $864.0K | $1.3M |
| Net Profit | $-2.2M | $-1.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 27.8% |
| Operating Margin | -735.9% | -163.6% |
| Net Margin | -258.8% | -145.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -21.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 36.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $864.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 27.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 49.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -163.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -116.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -735.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -145.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -107.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -258.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $147.0K | $38.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-65.1M | $40.8M |
| Total Assets | $34.9M | $42.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $25.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $147.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $40.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $40.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-65.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $42.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $42.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.9M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.0M | $-251.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-282.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -22.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-251.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-815.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-282.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -22.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -74.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
