vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Powerfleet, Inc. (AIOT) and APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES INC (AIT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $113.5M, roughly 10.2× Powerfleet, Inc.). APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 8.2% vs -3.0%, a 11.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.4% vs 6.6%). APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($93.4M vs $4.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Powerfleet, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (3.3% CAGR vs 0.7%).
Powerfleet, Inc. is an American company headquartered in Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey, that operates as a global provider of IoT and M2M solutions for securing, controlling, and tracking high-value enterprise assets. The company is a provider in the international telematics industry, providing fleet management, asset tracking, freight visibility, and driver behavior monitoring for industrial trucks, vehicle fleets, and shipping containers.
Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. (AIT) is a public, global company based in the U.S. and focused on the distribution of bearings, power transmission products, engineered fluid power components and systems, specialty flow control products, and other industrial supplies. AIT provides engineering, design and system integration for industrial and fluid power applications, as well as customized mechanical, fabricated rubber, fluid power, and flow control shop services.
AIOT vs AIT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2026 vs Q2 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $113.5M | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $-3.4M | $95.3M |
| Gross Margin | 55.2% | 30.4% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | 10.6% |
| Net Margin | -3.0% | 8.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.6% | 8.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 76.6% | 2.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.03 | $2.51 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $113.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $111.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $104.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $-3.4M | $95.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.3M | $100.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.2M | $107.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.4M | $99.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-14.3M | $93.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.9M | $92.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-22.3M | $103.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $97.2M |
| Q4 25 | 55.2% | 30.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 56.0% | 30.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 54.2% | 30.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 52.8% | 30.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.2% | 30.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 53.7% | 29.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.6% | 30.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 29.5% |
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.0% | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.7% | 11.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.2% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | 10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.2% | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.6% |
| Q4 25 | -3.0% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.8% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.8% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.0% | 8.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -13.5% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.5% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -29.6% | 8.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.03 | $2.51 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.03 | $2.63 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.08 | $2.80 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.09 | $2.57 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.11 | $2.39 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.02 | $2.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.21 | $2.64 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.2M | $406.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $237.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $485.0M | $1.9B |
| Total Assets | $959.5M | $3.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.49× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $31.2M | $406.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.9M | $418.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.2M | $388.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.4M | $352.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.6M | $303.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.0M | $538.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.2M | $460.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $456.5M |
| Q4 25 | $237.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $238.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $239.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $237.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $238.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $113.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $113.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $485.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $468.8M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $460.7M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $446.6M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $458.4M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $451.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $390.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $959.5M | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $936.9M | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $930.8M | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $910.1M | $3.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $908.7M | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $748.3M | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $684.9M | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.49× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.52× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.52× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.25× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $10.2M | $99.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $4.9M | $93.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.4% | 8.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.6% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.05× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $12.9M | $458.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.2M | $99.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5M | $119.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $147.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.5M | $122.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $95.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.2M | $127.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.6M | $119.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $84.2M |
| Q4 25 | $4.9M | $93.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $112.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | $138.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.1M | $114.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $89.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.0M | $122.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-13.2M | $111.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $76.7M |
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 9.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.4% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.5% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.7% |
| Q4 25 | 4.6% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.3% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.05× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.23× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.87× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIOT
| Services | $91.1M | 80% |
| Products | $22.4M | 20% |
AIT
| Service Center Based Distribution Segment | $625.2M | 54% |
| Engineered Solutions Segment | $398.9M | 34% |
| Other | $75.8M | 7% |
| Hydradyne LLC | $63.1M | 5% |
