vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Arteris, Inc. (AIP) and Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. (IDR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Arteris, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($20.1M vs $14.6M, roughly 1.4× Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.). Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 64.3% vs -42.2%, a 106.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (92.0% vs 30.0%). Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.2M vs $3.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (57.2% CAGR vs 24.7%).
Arteris, Inc. is a multinational technology company headquartered in Campbell, California. It develops the network-on-chip (NoC) IP and system-on-chip (SoC) integration automation software that is used to create semiconductor chip and chiplet designs for a variety of devices, particularly in automotive electronics, artificial intelligence, machine learning, enterprise computing, communications, consumer, industrial, and aerospace & defense markets. The company specializes in the development a...
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.IDREarnings & Financial Report
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. is a U.S.-based natural resource company focused on the exploration, development, and production of critical and strategic minerals. Primarily operating in Idaho, it targets rare earth elements, gold, silver, and other high-demand minerals, supplying products to the clean energy, defense, and industrial manufacturing sectors across North America.
AIP vs IDR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $20.1M | $14.6M |
| Net Profit | $-8.5M | $9.4M |
| Gross Margin | 90.8% | 68.5% |
| Operating Margin | -42.0% | 62.4% |
| Net Margin | -42.2% | 64.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 30.0% | 92.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3.7% | 220.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.19 | $0.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $20.1M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.4M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.5M | $9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5M | $7.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.5M | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.7M | $6.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.6M | $6.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.9M | $5.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.5M | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.0M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.1M | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.1M | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.2M | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.7M | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.3M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.4M | $2.2M |
| Q4 25 | 90.8% | 68.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 89.9% | 63.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 89.4% | 57.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 90.8% | 50.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 89.8% | 53.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 90.1% | 48.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 90.0% | 50.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 88.7% | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | -42.0% | 62.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -50.1% | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -50.0% | 26.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -46.6% | 19.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -45.9% | 36.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -53.8% | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -51.1% | 34.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -70.5% | 36.3% |
| Q4 25 | -42.2% | 64.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -51.6% | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -55.3% | 29.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -49.1% | 22.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -53.0% | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -52.2% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -57.2% | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -72.6% | 36.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.19 | $0.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.21 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.22 | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.19 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.20 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.22 | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.25 | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $33.9M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-14.6M | $108.2M |
| Total Assets | $115.0M | $116.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.02× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $33.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.8M | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $44.8M | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-14.6M | $108.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.4M | $74.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.5M | $49.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.8M | $39.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.2M | $37.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2M | $33.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3M | $25.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.5M | $21.6M |
| Q4 25 | $115.0M | $116.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $107.7M | $83.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.9M | $57.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $98.3M | $48.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.1M | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $97.7M | $40.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $96.4M | $32.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.4M | $28.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.15× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.2M | $10.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.0M | $8.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.1% | 56.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | 17.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.15× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $5.3M | $12.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.2M | $10.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.5M | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.6M | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $311.0K | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $477.0K | $2.6M |
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5M | $709.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.8M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7M | $1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.7M | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $264.0K | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $281.0K | $2.3M |
| Q4 25 | 15.1% | 56.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.2% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.2% | 26.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.2% | 13.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.3% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 38.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.2% | 38.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | 10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 19.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 5.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.50× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.08× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.19× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIP
| License And Maintenance | $17.5M | 87% |
| Variable Royalties And Other | $2.6M | 13% |
IDR
Segment breakdown not available.
