vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Arteris, Inc. (AIP) and MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($40.6M vs $20.1M, roughly 2.0× Arteris, Inc.). MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp runs the higher net margin — -19.9% vs -42.2%, a 22.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Arteris, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.0% vs -20.7%). Arteris, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($3.0M vs $-4.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Arteris, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (24.7% CAGR vs -3.4%).
Arteris, Inc. is a multinational technology company headquartered in Campbell, California. It develops the network-on-chip (NoC) IP and system-on-chip (SoC) integration automation software that is used to create semiconductor chip and chiplet designs for a variety of devices, particularly in automotive electronics, artificial intelligence, machine learning, enterprise computing, communications, consumer, industrial, and aerospace & defense markets. The company specializes in the development a...
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
AIP vs MX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $20.1M | $40.6M |
| Net Profit | $-8.5M | $-8.1M |
| Gross Margin | 90.8% | 9.3% |
| Operating Margin | -42.0% | -26.1% |
| Net Margin | -42.2% | -19.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 30.0% | -20.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3.7% | 50.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.19 | $-0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $20.1M | $40.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.4M | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.5M | $47.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5M | $44.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.5M | $51.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.7M | $55.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.6M | $46.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.9M | $43.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.5M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.0M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.1M | $323.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.1M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.2M | $-16.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.7M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.3M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.4M | $-15.4M |
| Q4 25 | 90.8% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 89.9% | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 89.4% | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 90.8% | 20.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 89.8% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 90.1% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 90.0% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 88.7% | 14.6% |
| Q4 25 | -42.0% | -26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -50.1% | -25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -50.0% | -15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -46.6% | -14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -45.9% | -12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -53.8% | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -51.1% | -12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -70.5% | -21.6% |
| Q4 25 | -42.2% | -19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -51.6% | -28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -55.3% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -49.1% | -19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -53.0% | -31.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -52.2% | -17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -57.2% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -72.6% | -35.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.19 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.21 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.22 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.19 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.20 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.22 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.25 | $-0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $33.9M | $103.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-14.6M | $248.3M |
| Total Assets | $115.0M | $351.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $33.9M | $103.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.0M | $108.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.0M | $113.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.3M | $132.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.8M | $138.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.7M | $151.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.8M | $162.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $44.8M | $171.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-14.6M | $248.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.4M | $255.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.5M | $270.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.8M | $269.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.2M | $276.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2M | $299.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3M | $305.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.5M | $321.9M |
| Q4 25 | $115.0M | $351.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $107.7M | $359.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.9M | $370.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $98.3M | $373.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.1M | $379.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $97.7M | $411.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $96.4M | $412.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.4M | $426.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.2M | $5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.0M | $-4.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.1% | -11.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | 25.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $5.3M | $-54.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.2M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2M | $162.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.5M | $-25.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.6M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $311.0K | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $477.0K | $-4.0M |
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.8M | $-37.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.7M | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $-15.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $264.0K | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $281.0K | $-4.6M |
| Q4 25 | 15.1% | -11.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.2% | -16.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.2% | -77.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.2% | -10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.3% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | -28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.2% | -10.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -77.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIP
| License And Maintenance | $17.5M | 87% |
| Variable Royalties And Other | $2.6M | 13% |
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |