vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Arteris, Inc. (AIP) and Orange County Bancorp, Inc. (OBT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Orange County Bancorp, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($33.0M vs $20.1M, roughly 1.6× Arteris, Inc.). Orange County Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 37.6% vs -42.2%, a 79.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Arteris, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.0% vs 20.6%). Orange County Bancorp, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($41.3M vs $3.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Arteris, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (24.7% CAGR vs 14.3%).
Arteris, Inc. is a multinational technology company headquartered in Campbell, California. It develops the network-on-chip (NoC) IP and system-on-chip (SoC) integration automation software that is used to create semiconductor chip and chiplet designs for a variety of devices, particularly in automotive electronics, artificial intelligence, machine learning, enterprise computing, communications, consumer, industrial, and aerospace & defense markets. The company specializes in the development a...
Orange County Bancorp, Inc. is a Delaware-registered bank holding company operating mainly in New York, U.S. It offers a full range of retail and commercial banking services, including deposit accounts, loans and wealth management solutions, serving individual consumers, small and mid-sized corporate clients in its regional footprint.
AIP vs OBT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $20.1M | $33.0M |
| Net Profit | $-8.5M | $12.4M |
| Gross Margin | 90.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -42.0% | 41.4% |
| Net Margin | -42.2% | 37.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 30.0% | 20.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3.7% | 73.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.19 | $0.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $20.1M | $33.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.4M | $33.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.5M | $32.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5M | $28.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.5M | $27.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.7M | $27.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.6M | $27.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.9M | $25.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.5M | $12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.0M | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.1M | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.1M | $8.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.2M | $7.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.7M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.3M | $8.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.4M | $9.3M |
| Q4 25 | 90.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 89.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 89.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 90.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 89.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 90.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 90.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 88.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -42.0% | 41.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -50.1% | 38.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -50.0% | 41.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -46.6% | 40.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -45.9% | 32.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -53.8% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -51.1% | 36.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -70.5% | 45.9% |
| Q4 25 | -42.2% | 37.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -51.6% | 29.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -55.3% | 32.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -49.1% | 31.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -53.0% | 26.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -52.2% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -57.2% | 29.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -72.6% | 36.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.19 | $0.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.21 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.22 | $0.87 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $0.77 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.19 | $0.64 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.20 | $0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.22 | $0.73 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.25 | $0.82 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $33.9M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-14.6M | $284.4M |
| Total Assets | $115.0M | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $33.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $44.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-14.6M | $284.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.4M | $270.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.5M | $252.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.8M | $201.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.2M | $185.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2M | $193.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3M | $177.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.5M | $168.7M |
| Q4 25 | $115.0M | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $107.7M | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.9M | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $98.3M | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.1M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $97.7M | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $96.4M | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.4M | $2.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.2M | $43.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.0M | $41.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.1% | 125.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | 7.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $5.3M | $69.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.2M | $43.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2M | $30.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.5M | $-5.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $4.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.6M | $34.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $10.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $311.0K | $9.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $477.0K | $2.3M |
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | $41.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5M | $29.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.8M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7M | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.7M | $32.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $264.0K | $9.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $281.0K | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | 15.1% | 125.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.2% | 87.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.2% | -17.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.2% | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.3% | 120.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | 36.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 32.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.2% | 7.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.01× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.24× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIP
| License And Maintenance | $17.5M | 87% |
| Variable Royalties And Other | $2.6M | 13% |
OBT
Segment breakdown not available.
