vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Arteris, Inc. (AIP) and OP Bancorp (OPBK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OP Bancorp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($24.3M vs $20.1M, roughly 1.2× Arteris, Inc.). On growth, Arteris, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.0% vs 13.7%). OP Bancorp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($23.4M vs $3.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Arteris, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (24.7% CAGR vs 11.4%).
Arteris, Inc. is a multinational technology company headquartered in Campbell, California. It develops the network-on-chip (NoC) IP and system-on-chip (SoC) integration automation software that is used to create semiconductor chip and chiplet designs for a variety of devices, particularly in automotive electronics, artificial intelligence, machine learning, enterprise computing, communications, consumer, industrial, and aerospace & defense markets. The company specializes in the development a...
OP Bancorp is the bank holding company for Open Bank, a community-oriented commercial bank headquartered in California, United States. It provides a full range of banking solutions including deposit accounts, commercial real estate loans, small business financing, and consumer lending products, primarily catering to small and medium-sized enterprises, local immigrant communities, and retail clients across Southern California.
AIP vs OPBK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $20.1M | $24.3M |
| Net Profit | $-8.5M | — |
| Gross Margin | 90.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -42.0% | 39.2% |
| Net Margin | -42.2% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 30.0% | 13.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.19 | $0.48 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $20.1M | $24.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.4M | $24.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.5M | $23.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5M | $22.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.5M | $21.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.7M | $20.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.6M | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.9M | $19.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.0M | $6.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.1M | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.1M | $5.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.7M | $5.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.3M | $5.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.4M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | 90.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 89.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 89.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 90.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 89.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 90.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 90.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 88.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -42.0% | 39.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -50.1% | 39.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -50.0% | 35.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -46.6% | 34.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -45.9% | 31.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -53.8% | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -51.1% | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -70.5% | 37.1% |
| Q4 25 | -42.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -51.6% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -55.3% | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -49.1% | 25.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -53.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -52.2% | 26.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -57.2% | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -72.6% | 26.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.19 | $0.48 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.21 | $0.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.22 | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $0.37 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.19 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.20 | $0.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.22 | $0.36 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.25 | $0.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $33.9M | $167.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-14.6M | $227.9M |
| Total Assets | $115.0M | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $33.9M | $167.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.0M | $166.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.0M | $205.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.3M | $198.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.8M | $134.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.7M | $166.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.8M | $127.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $44.8M | $139.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-14.6M | $227.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.4M | $221.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.5M | $213.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.8M | $210.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.2M | $205.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2M | $203.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3M | $195.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.5M | $194.7M |
| Q4 25 | $115.0M | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $107.7M | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.9M | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $98.3M | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.1M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $97.7M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $96.4M | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.4M | $2.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.2M | $26.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.0M | $23.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.1% | 96.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | 11.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $5.3M | $43.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.2M | $26.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2M | $23.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.5M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $5.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.6M | $31.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $13.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $311.0K | $15.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $477.0K | $-3.2M |
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | $23.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5M | $23.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.8M | $-7.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7M | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.7M | $29.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $264.0K | $15.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $281.0K | $-3.2M |
| Q4 25 | 15.1% | 96.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.2% | 95.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.2% | -32.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.2% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.3% | 139.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | 61.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 77.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.2% | -16.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 6.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.57× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.45× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.90× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.60× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIP
| License And Maintenance | $17.5M | 87% |
| Variable Royalties And Other | $2.6M | 13% |
OPBK
Segment breakdown not available.