vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Arteris, Inc. (AIP) and Outdoor Holding Co (POWW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Arteris, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($20.1M vs $13.4M, roughly 1.5× Outdoor Holding Co). Outdoor Holding Co runs the higher net margin — 16.7% vs -42.2%, a 58.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Arteris, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.0% vs -54.1%). Outdoor Holding Co produced more free cash flow last quarter ($5.0M vs $3.0M).
Arteris, Inc. is a multinational technology company headquartered in Campbell, California. It develops the network-on-chip (NoC) IP and system-on-chip (SoC) integration automation software that is used to create semiconductor chip and chiplet designs for a variety of devices, particularly in automotive electronics, artificial intelligence, machine learning, enterprise computing, communications, consumer, industrial, and aerospace & defense markets. The company specializes in the development a...
Vista Outdoor Inc. was an American designer, manufacturer, and marketer that operated in two segments: shooting sports and outdoor products. It was a "house of brands" with more than 40 labels and subsidiaries.
AIP vs POWW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $20.1M | $13.4M |
| Net Profit | $-8.5M | $2.2M |
| Gross Margin | 90.8% | 87.1% |
| Operating Margin | -42.0% | 14.7% |
| Net Margin | -42.2% | 16.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 30.0% | -54.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3.7% | 108.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.19 | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $20.1M | $13.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.4M | $12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.5M | $11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5M | $12.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.5M | $12.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.7M | $12.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.6M | $12.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.9M | $-50.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.5M | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.0M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.1M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.1M | $-77.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.2M | $-26.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.7M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.3M | $-14.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.4M | $-5.2M |
| Q4 25 | 90.8% | 87.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 89.9% | 87.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 89.4% | 87.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 90.8% | 87.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 89.8% | 87.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 90.1% | 86.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 90.0% | 85.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 88.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -42.0% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -50.1% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -50.0% | -50.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -46.6% | -213.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -45.9% | -163.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -53.8% | -50.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -51.1% | -50.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -70.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | -42.2% | 16.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -51.6% | 11.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -55.3% | -54.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -49.1% | -614.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -53.0% | -208.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -52.2% | -103.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -57.2% | -120.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -72.6% | 10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.19 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.21 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.22 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $-0.67 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.19 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.20 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.22 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.25 | $-0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $33.9M | $69.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-14.6M | $237.3M |
| Total Assets | $115.0M | $271.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $33.9M | $69.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.0M | $65.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.0M | $63.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.3M | $30.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.8M | $31.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.7M | $33.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.8M | $50.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $44.8M | $55.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-14.6M | $237.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.4M | $235.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.5M | $222.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.8M | $222.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.2M | $299.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2M | $325.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3M | $342.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.5M | $358.0M |
| Q4 25 | $115.0M | $271.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $107.7M | $270.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.9M | $269.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $98.3M | $297.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.1M | $355.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $97.7M | $368.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $96.4M | $398.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.4M | $403.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.2M | $5.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.0M | $5.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.1% | 37.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | 4.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $5.3M | $-2.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.2M | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.5M | $-6.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.6M | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $311.0K | $-547.5K | ||
| Q1 24 | $477.0K | $4.3M |
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | $5.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.8M | $-7.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.7M | $720.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $264.0K | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $281.0K | $1.4M |
| Q4 25 | 15.1% | 37.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.2% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.2% | -63.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.2% | -18.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.3% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | -88.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | -11.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.2% | -2.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | -5.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.55× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIP
| License And Maintenance | $17.5M | 87% |
| Variable Royalties And Other | $2.6M | 13% |
POWW
Segment breakdown not available.
