vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES INC (AIT) and APi Group Corp (APG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
APi Group Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.8× APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES INC). APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 8.2% vs 4.6%, a 3.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, APi Group Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.8% vs 8.4%). APi Group Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($356.0M vs $93.4M). Over the past eight quarters, APi Group Corp's revenue compounded faster (15.0% CAGR vs 0.7%).
Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. (AIT) is a public, global company based in the U.S. and focused on the distribution of bearings, power transmission products, engineered fluid power components and systems, specialty flow control products, and other industrial supplies. AIT provides engineering, design and system integration for industrial and fluid power applications, as well as customized mechanical, fabricated rubber, fluid power, and flow control shop services.
X.AI Corp., doing business as xAI, is an American company working in the area of artificial intelligence (AI), social media and technology that is a wholly owned subsidiary of American aerospace company SpaceX. Founded by Elon Musk in 2023, the company's flagship products are the generative AI chatbot named Grok and the social media platform X, the latter of which they acquired in March 2025.
AIT vs APG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $95.3M | $97.0M |
| Gross Margin | 30.4% | 32.0% |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | 7.7% |
| Net Margin | 8.2% | 4.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.4% | 13.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 2.2% | 44.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.51 | $-1.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $95.3M | $97.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $100.8M | $93.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.8M | $77.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.8M | $35.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.3M | $67.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $69.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $103.5M | $69.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $97.2M | $45.0M |
| Q4 25 | 30.4% | 32.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.1% | 31.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.6% | 30.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.5% | 31.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.6% | 30.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.6% | 31.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.7% | 31.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.5% | 30.7% |
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.8% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.0% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.1% | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.3% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.3% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.0% | 7.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.6% | 6.2% |
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.4% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.9% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.5% | 2.8% |
| Q4 25 | $2.51 | $-1.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.63 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.80 | $0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.57 | $0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.39 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.36 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.64 | $0.22 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.48 | $-1.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $406.0M | $912.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.8B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $3.4B |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $8.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.81× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $406.0M | $912.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $418.7M | $555.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $388.4M | $432.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $352.8M | $460.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.4M | $499.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $538.5M | $487.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $460.6M | $324.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $456.5M | $247.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.7B |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $8.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $8.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $8.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $8.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $8.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | $7.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.92× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.19× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $99.7M | $382.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $93.4M | $356.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.0% | 16.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 1.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.05× | 3.94× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $458.5M | $663.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $99.7M | $382.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.3M | $232.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $147.0M | $83.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $122.5M | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $95.1M | $283.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.7M | $220.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.2M | $110.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $84.2M | $7.0M |
| Q4 25 | $93.4M | $356.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $112.0M | $201.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $138.2M | $56.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $114.9M | $50.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $89.9M | $265.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $122.2M | $198.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $111.7M | $88.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $76.7M | $-15.0M |
| Q4 25 | 8.0% | 16.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.3% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.3% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.1% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.6% | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.7% | -0.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.05× | 3.94× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.18× | 2.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.36× | 1.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.23× | 1.77× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.02× | 4.22× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.39× | 3.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.15× | 1.59× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.87× | 0.16× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIT
| Service Center Based Distribution Segment | $625.2M | 54% |
| Engineered Solutions Segment | $398.9M | 34% |
| Other | $75.8M | 7% |
| Hydradyne LLC | $63.1M | 5% |
APG
Segment breakdown not available.
