vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES INC (AIT) and Constellation Brands (STZ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Constellation Brands is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.8× APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES INC). Constellation Brands runs the higher net margin — 22.6% vs 8.0%, a 14.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.3% vs -9.8%). Constellation Brands produced more free cash flow last quarter ($370.9M vs $95.4M). Over the past eight quarters, APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (3.8% CAGR vs 1.9%).
Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. (AIT) is a public, global company based in the U.S. and focused on the distribution of bearings, power transmission products, engineered fluid power components and systems, specialty flow control products, and other industrial supplies. AIT provides engineering, design and system integration for industrial and fluid power applications, as well as customized mechanical, fabricated rubber, fluid power, and flow control shop services.
Constellation Brands, Inc. is an American producer and marketer of beer, wine, and spirits. A Fortune 500 company, Constellation is the largest beer import company in the US, measured by sales, and has the third-largest market share of all major beer suppliers. It also has sizable investments in medical and recreational cannabis through its association with Canopy Growth. Based in Rochester, New York, Constellation has about 40 facilities and approximately 9,000 employees.
AIT vs STZ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $2.2B |
| Net Profit | $99.8M | $502.8M |
| Gross Margin | 30.4% | 53.2% |
| Operating Margin | 11.0% | 31.1% |
| Net Margin | 8.0% | 22.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.3% | -9.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -0.0% | -18.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.65 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | $99.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $95.3M | $502.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $100.8M | $466.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.8M | $516.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.8M | $-375.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.3M | $615.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $-1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $103.5M | $877.0M |
| Q1 26 | 30.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.4% | 53.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.1% | 52.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.6% | 50.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.5% | 51.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.6% | 52.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.6% | 51.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.7% | 52.7% |
| Q1 26 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | 31.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.8% | 35.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.0% | 28.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.1% | -6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.3% | 32.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.3% | -42.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.0% | 35.4% |
| Q1 26 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | 22.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.4% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | 20.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.6% | -17.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 25.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | -41.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.9% | 32.9% |
| Q1 26 | $2.65 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.51 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.63 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.80 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.57 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.39 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.36 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.64 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $171.6M | $152.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $365.3M | $10.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $7.7B |
| Total Assets | $3.0B | $21.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.20× | 1.33× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $171.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $406.0M | $152.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $418.7M | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $388.4M | $73.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $352.8M | $68.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.4M | $73.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $538.5M | $64.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $460.6M | $73.8M |
| Q1 26 | $365.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $10.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.1B |
| Q1 26 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $7.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $7.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $10.3B |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $21.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $21.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $22.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $21.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $22.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $23.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $26.1B |
| Q1 26 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.54× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.55× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.08× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $319.1M | $616.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $95.4M | $370.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 16.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | 11.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.20× | 1.23× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $438.9M | $1.8B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $319.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $99.7M | $616.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.3M | $852.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $147.0M | $637.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $122.5M | $594.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $95.1M | $685.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.2M | $690.5M |
| Q1 26 | $95.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $93.4M | $370.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $112.0M | $634.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $138.2M | $444.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $114.9M | $312.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $89.9M | $456.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $122.2M | $854.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $111.7M | $315.2M |
| Q1 26 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.0% | 16.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.3% | 25.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.3% | 17.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | 18.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.1% | 29.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.6% | 11.8% |
| Q1 26 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 11.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 13.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 14.1% |
| Q1 26 | 3.20× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.05× | 1.23× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.18× | 1.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.36× | 1.23× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.23× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.02× | 1.11× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.39× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.15× | 0.79× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIT
Segment breakdown not available.
STZ
| Beer | $2.0B | 90% |
| Constellation Wines And Spirits | $213.1M | 10% |
