vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES INC (AIT) and TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (THS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $840.3M, roughly 1.5× TreeHouse Foods, Inc.). APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 8.0% vs -31.6%, a 39.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.3% vs 0.1%). Over the past eight quarters, APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (3.8% CAGR vs -3.9%).
Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. (AIT) is a public, global company based in the U.S. and focused on the distribution of bearings, power transmission products, engineered fluid power components and systems, specialty flow control products, and other industrial supplies. AIT provides engineering, design and system integration for industrial and fluid power applications, as well as customized mechanical, fabricated rubber, fluid power, and flow control shop services.
TreeHouse Foods Inc. is a multinational food processing company specializing in producing private label packaged foods headquartered in Oak Brook, Illinois. Created in 2005 and consisting entirely of acquisitions, in 2010 the company had sales of $2 billion and employed over 4,000 people at 20 facilities. Food Processing magazine named TreeHouse Foods their 2010 Processor of the Year, calling them "the biggest company you never heard of". In 2015, the company was the 37th-largest food and bev...
AIT vs THS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $840.3M |
| Net Profit | $99.8M | $-265.8M |
| Gross Margin | 30.4% | 18.8% |
| Operating Margin | 11.0% | -30.2% |
| Net Margin | 8.0% | -31.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.3% | 0.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -0.0% | -7717.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.65 | $-5.26 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $840.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $798.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $792.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $905.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $839.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $788.5M |
| Q1 26 | $99.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $95.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $100.8M | $-265.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.8M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.8M | $-31.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.3M | $58.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $103.5M | $-16.7M |
| Q1 26 | 30.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.1% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.6% | 17.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.5% | 14.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.6% | 19.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.6% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.7% | 16.3% |
| Q1 26 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.8% | -30.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.1% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.3% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.3% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.0% | -0.5% |
| Q1 26 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.4% | -31.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | -0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.6% | -4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | -0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.9% | -2.1% |
| Q1 26 | $2.65 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.51 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.63 | $-5.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.80 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.57 | $-0.63 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.39 | $1.12 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.36 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.64 | $-0.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $171.6M | $21.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $365.3M | $1.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $3.0B | $3.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.20× | 1.18× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $171.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $406.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $418.7M | $21.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $388.4M | $17.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $352.8M | $16.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.4M | $289.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $538.5M | $102.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $460.6M | $105.8M |
| Q1 26 | $365.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $3.9B |
| Q1 26 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.90× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $319.1M | $38.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $95.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.20× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $438.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $319.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $99.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.3M | $38.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $147.0M | $-47.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $122.5M | $-53.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $95.1M | $296.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.7M | $41.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.2M | $-19.4M |
| Q1 26 | $95.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $93.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $112.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $138.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $114.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $89.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $122.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $111.7M | $-42.2M |
| Q1 26 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.6% | -5.4% |
| Q1 26 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 2.9% |
| Q1 26 | 3.20× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.18× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.23× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.02× | 5.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.39× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.15× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIT
Segment breakdown not available.
THS
| Retail Grocery Customers | $670.6M | 80% |
| Food Away From Home And Other | $85.3M | 10% |
| Co Manufacturing | $84.4M | 10% |
