vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Xiao-I Corp (AIXI) and AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC (AUBN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Xiao-I Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($11.5M vs $8.5M, roughly 1.4× AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC). AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC runs the higher net margin — 19.7% vs -263.9%, a 283.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Xiao-i is a Chinese cognitive artificial intelligence enterprise founded in 2001.
Auburn Bank is an American community bank providing services in the East of Alabama as a state registered bank. The Bank offers financial products and services including checking, savings, and lending. The bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta. Its operation is regulated by the Alabama Superintendent of Banks.
AIXI vs AUBN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.5M | $8.5M |
| Net Profit | $-30.4M | $1.7M |
| Gross Margin | 58.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -254.9% | 25.1% |
| Net Margin | -263.9% | 19.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 8.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 6.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5M | $8.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.0M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-30.4M | $1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.5M | $1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 58.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 33.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -254.9% | 28.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -45.0% | 29.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 20.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 19.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -263.9% | 22.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 20.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -47.2% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 18.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.64 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.50 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.64 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $92.1M |
| Total Assets | $82.4M | $1.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $92.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $89.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $86.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $83.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $78.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $75.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $74.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $82.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $996.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $977.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $990.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.6M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $979.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.3M | $12.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $10.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 128.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 17.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 7.42× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $12.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $2.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $10.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 128.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 111.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 26.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.72× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.08× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.76× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.25× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.