vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Xiao-I Corp (AIXI) and Globavend Holdings Ltd (GVH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Globavend Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.7M vs $11.5M, roughly 1.2× Xiao-I Corp). Globavend Holdings Ltd runs the higher net margin — 3.3% vs -263.9%, a 267.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Xiao-i is a Chinese cognitive artificial intelligence enterprise founded in 2001.
Globavend Holdings Ltd is a provider of smart unattended retail solutions, focusing on the design, supply, and operation of intelligent vending machines. It primarily serves markets across Australia, New Zealand, and Southeast Asia, offering end-to-end services including hardware manufacturing, inventory management software, and after-sales support to clients in retail, FMCG, and workplace service segments.
AIXI vs GVH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.5M | $13.7M |
| Net Profit | $-30.4M | $450.3K |
| Gross Margin | 58.1% | 10.5% |
| Operating Margin | -254.9% | 5.8% |
| Net Margin | -263.9% | 3.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 63.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -49.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $6.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | $11.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 23 | $26.5M | — |
| Q2 25 | $-30.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $450.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $898.8K | ||
| Q2 23 | $-18.8M | — |
| Q2 25 | 58.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 23 | 77.3% | — |
| Q2 25 | -254.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -45.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 13.8% | ||
| Q2 23 | -51.5% | — |
| Q2 25 | -263.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -47.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 23 | -70.9% | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.64 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.57 | ||
| Q2 23 | $-0.80 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.0M | $915.2K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $5.7M |
| Total Assets | $82.4M | $6.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $5.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $915.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 23 | $4.7M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q2 23 | $525.1K | — |
| Q2 25 | $82.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | $51.3M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.3M | $-906.3K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-1.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -8.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -2.01× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-906.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-256.6K | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-730.0K | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -8.7% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.29× | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
