vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Xiao-I Corp (AIXI) and MOGU Inc. (MOGU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MOGU Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($19.5M vs $11.5M, roughly 1.7× Xiao-I Corp). MOGU Inc. runs the higher net margin — -44.3% vs -263.9%, a 219.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Xiao-i is a Chinese cognitive artificial intelligence enterprise founded in 2001.
Mogu Mogu is a brand of fruit-flavoured drink with pieces of nata de coco, produced by Thailand-based Sappe Public Company Limited and exported to many international markets, especially South Korea, the Philippines, Indonesia and France.
AIXI vs MOGU — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.5M | $19.5M |
| Net Profit | $-30.4M | $-8.6M |
| Gross Margin | 58.1% | 0.0% |
| Operating Margin | -254.9% | -71.6% |
| Net Margin | -263.9% | -44.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -12.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -5.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | $11.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $19.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $22.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | $26.5M | — |
| Q2 25 | $-30.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-8.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-8.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | $-18.8M | — |
| Q2 25 | 58.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 23 | 77.3% | — |
| Q2 25 | -254.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -71.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -45.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -49.4% | ||
| Q2 23 | -51.5% | — |
| Q2 25 | -263.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -44.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -47.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -37.0% | ||
| Q2 23 | -70.9% | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.64 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 23 | $-0.80 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.0M | $52.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $70.1M |
| Total Assets | $82.4M | $118.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $5.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $52.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $58.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | $4.7M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $70.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $81.5M | ||
| Q2 23 | $525.1K | — |
| Q2 25 | $82.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $118.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $130.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | $51.3M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.3M | $-9.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-10.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -55.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 7.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-9.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-5.6M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-10.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-18.6M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -55.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -84.0% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 58.7% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
