vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Akamai Technologies (AKAM) and CLPS Inc (CLPS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Akamai Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $82.8M, roughly 13.2× CLPS Inc). Akamai Technologies runs the higher net margin — 7.8% vs 0.2%, a 7.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Akamai Technologies, Inc. provides cloud services for securing, delivering, and optimizing content and business applications over the internet in the United States and internationally. The company offers cloud solutions to keep infrastructure, websites, applications, application programming interfaces, and users safe from various cyberattacks and online threats while enhancing performance. It also provides web and mobile performance solutions to enable dynamic websites and applications; media...
CLPS Inc is a global information technology, consulting and digital solutions provider primarily serving the financial services sector, including banking, insurance and asset management clients. It also offers tailored tech solutions for retail, healthcare and e-commerce segments, with operating footprints across North America, Asia Pacific and Europe.
AKAM vs CLPS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q2 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $82.8M |
| Net Profit | $85.1M | $183.0K |
| Gross Margin | 58.7% | 23.1% |
| Operating Margin | 8.7% | 0.2% |
| Net Margin | 7.8% | 0.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.4% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -39.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.57 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | — | $82.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $71.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $979.6M | — |
| Q2 26 | — | $183.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $85.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $140.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $103.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $123.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $139.9M | $-993.5K | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $131.7M | — |
| Q2 26 | — | 23.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 58.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 59.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 58.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.4% | 21.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 58.9% | — |
| Q2 26 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | -1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.1% | — |
| Q2 26 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.7% | -1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.4% | — |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.57 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.97 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.71 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.82 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.92 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.38 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.86 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | $29.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.0B | $57.6M |
| Total Assets | $11.5B | $118.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | — | $29.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $966.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $31.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | — |
| Q2 26 | — | $57.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.9B | $63.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | — |
| Q2 26 | — | $118.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.4B | $110.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.1B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $366.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $234.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 21.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.31× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.0B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $366.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $441.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $459.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $251.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $343.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $392.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $431.0M | — |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $234.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $329.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $313.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $133.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $250.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $279.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $340.0M | — |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.7% | — |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.3% | — |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.31× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.15× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.43× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.04× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.46× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.78× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.27× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AKAM
| Security | $592.4M | 54% |
| Delivery | $311.1M | 28% |
| Cloud Computing | $191.4M | 17% |
CLPS
Segment breakdown not available.
