vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Akamai Technologies (AKAM) and HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP, INC. (THG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.6× Akamai Technologies). HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP, INC. runs the higher net margin — 11.0% vs 7.8%, a 3.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Akamai Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.4% vs 6.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Akamai Technologies's revenue compounded faster (5.3% CAGR vs 5.2%).
Akamai Technologies, Inc. provides cloud services for securing, delivering, and optimizing content and business applications over the internet in the United States and internationally. The company offers cloud solutions to keep infrastructure, websites, applications, application programming interfaces, and users safe from various cyberattacks and online threats while enhancing performance. It also provides web and mobile performance solutions to enable dynamic websites and applications; media...
The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. is an insurance company based in Worcester, Massachusetts. It was the original name of a property-liability insurance firm established in 1852, and it remained a publicly traded company under that name until the early 1990s, when it changed its name to Allmerica Property & Casualty Companies.
AKAM vs THG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $1.7B |
| Net Profit | $85.1M | $186.8M |
| Gross Margin | 58.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 8.7% | 11.1% |
| Net Margin | 7.8% | 11.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.4% | 6.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -39.2% | 45.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.57 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $979.6M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $186.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $85.1M | $198.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $140.2M | $178.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $103.6M | $157.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $123.2M | $128.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $139.9M | $167.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.9M | $102.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $131.7M | $40.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 58.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 59.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 58.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 58.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.7% | 17.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.7% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.5% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.2% | 11.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.1% | 6.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | 11.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.3% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.9% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.1% | 8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.7% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.4% | 2.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.57 | $5.46 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.97 | $4.90 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.71 | $4.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.82 | $3.50 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.92 | $4.60 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.38 | $2.80 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.86 | $1.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | $243.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $843.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.0B | $3.0B |
| Total Assets | $11.5B | $16.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $243.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $915.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $966.6M | $244.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $315.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $435.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $427.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $337.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $843.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $843.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $843.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $347.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $722.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $722.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.0B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.9B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $2.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $16.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.5B | $16.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.8B | $16.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5B | $15.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $15.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.4B | $15.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $15.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.1B | $14.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $366.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $234.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 21.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.31× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.0B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $366.6M | $378.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $441.8M | $554.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $459.1M | $206.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $251.2M | $38.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $343.8M | $213.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $392.5M | $394.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $431.0M | $139.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $234.9M | $377.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $329.1M | $551.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $313.6M | $204.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $133.4M | $37.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $250.9M | $210.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $279.7M | $392.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $340.0M | $137.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.5% | 22.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.2% | 33.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.1% | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.6% | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.8% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.7% | 8.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.3% | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.31× | 1.91× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.15× | 3.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.43× | 1.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.04× | 0.30× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.46× | 1.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.78× | 3.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.27× | 3.44× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AKAM
| Security | $592.4M | 54% |
| Delivery | $311.1M | 28% |
| Cloud Computing | $191.4M | 17% |
THG
| Premiums earned | $1.6B | 92% |
| Other | $124.6M | 7% |
| Fees and other income | $6.2M | 0% |
