vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ACADIA REALTY TRUST (AKR) and AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP (AMSC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ACADIA REALTY TRUST is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($103.0M vs $74.5M, roughly 1.4× AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP). AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP runs the higher net margin — 158.1% vs 135.1%, a 23.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.4% vs -1.3%). Over the past eight quarters, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP's revenue compounded faster (33.2% CAGR vs 7.0%).
Acadia Realty Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that specializes in owning, operating, and redeveloping high-quality retail and mixed-use properties, primarily in dense, high-barrier-to-entry U.S. markets. Its portfolio includes neighborhood shopping centers, urban street retail assets, and community-focused mixed-use developments.
Anglo American plc is a British multinational mining company with headquarters in London, England. It is the world's largest producer of platinum, representing approximately 40 percent of global output, as well as being a major producer of diamonds, copper, nickel, iron ore, polyhalite and steelmaking coal. The company has operations in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South America.
AKR vs AMSC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $103.0M | $74.5M |
| Net Profit | $139.1M | $117.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 30.7% |
| Operating Margin | 153.9% | 4.5% |
| Net Margin | 135.1% | 158.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.3% | 21.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -58.2% | 4679.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $2.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $103.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $74.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $65.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $72.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $66.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.3M | $61.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $54.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.3M | $40.3M |
| Q1 26 | $139.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $117.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2M | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.3M | $4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $-2.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 30.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 26.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.3% |
| Q1 26 | 153.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.4% | -8.2% |
| Q1 26 | 135.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 158.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.0% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | -6.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.08 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.07 | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.4M | $141.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6B | $536.8M |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $719.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $31.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $141.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $212.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $207.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $79.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.8M | $75.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.2M | $72.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.9M | $93.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $536.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $342.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $333.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $197.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $192.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $187.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $143.3M |
| Q1 26 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $719.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $445.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $452.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $310.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4B | $310.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $298.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $240.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.82× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.95× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $3.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $2.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 3.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.7% | 1.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $16.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.4M | $5.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.6M | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.0M | $3.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.8% |
| Q1 26 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.61× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.22× | ||
| Q4 24 | 121.08× | 2.38× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.64× | 2.60× | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.25× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AKR
| Rental | $98.6M | 96% |
| Other | $4.4M | 4% |
AMSC
| Equipment And Systems | $56.0M | 75% |
| Megatran | $14.1M | 19% |
| Comtrafo Industria De Transformadores Eletricos SA | $4.6M | 6% |
